Recent court decisions impact current peer review activity
Beatty, Y.
Tennessee medicine journal of the Tennessee Medical Association 103(8): 17
2010
ISSN/ISBN: 1088-6222 PMID: 20961014 Document Number: 641419
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654Schulte, D.J. 2015: Peer Review Privilege Upheld in Michigan's Supreme Court Michigan medicine 114(4): 4
Horty, J. 1986: Michigan appellate court upholds peer review committee's decision Modern healthcare 16(1): 118-119
Hammerschmidt, D.E. 1994: The vagaries of peer review: a new study and our experience. "At a certain level, we all are more or less held hostage to the peer-review system" Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 124(2): 146-148
Strange, V.; Forrest, S.; Oakley, A. 2002: Peer-led sex education--characteristics of peer educators and their perceptions of the impact on them of participation in a peer education programme Health Education Research 17(3): 327-337
Lee, S.T. 1997: The impact of electronic publication and the E-journal on quality and the peer review process Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore 26(4): 393
Rickenbach, M.; Dunleavey, J.; Little, P.; Mullee, M. 1997: Senior house officer training. Impact of existing peer review visits needs to be increased Bmj 314(7097): 1829-1830
Gielen, M; De Wever, B 2015: Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content Computers in Human Behavior 52: 315-325
Carandang, R.Royce.; Shibanuma, A.; Kiriya, J.; Vardeleon, K.Rose.; Marges, M.Aileen.; Asis, E.; Murayama, H.; Jimba, M. 2019: Leadership and Peer Counseling Program: Evaluation of Training and Its Impact on Filipino Senior Peer Counselors International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(21)
Teres, D. 1992: Les décisions de ne pas réanimer: la tendance actuelle aux Etats-Unis - Decisions not to resuscitate: current trend in United States les Decisions d'Arret Therapeutique en Reanimation 31(4): 301-304
2003: Court can make parental decisions Bulletin of medical ethics 2003(193): 4
Ortolon, K. 1993: Court decisions demonstrate new fairness Texas Medicine 89(2): 30-31
Young, P.; Finn, B.ár.C.; Young, D.R. 2008: Court intervention in medical decisions and the generation of new conflicts Medicina 68(3): 266-267
Davidson, A.T.; Coleman, A.H. 1979: Recent interesting court decisions in malpractice cases Journal of the National Medical Association 71(11): 1133-1134
Raub, J.M.; Carson, N.J.; Cook, B.L.; Wyshak, G.; Hauser, B.B. 2013: Predictors of custody and visitation decisions by a family court clinic Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 41(2): 206-218
Jochemsen, H. 1998: Dutch court decisions on nonvoluntary euthanasia critically reviewed Issues in Law and Medicine 13(4): 447-458
Horty, J.F. 1981: Court shares burden with doctors of making life-and-death decisions Modern Healthcare 11(8): 144; 150
Averbuch, A.; Roditi, Y.; Zaidenberg, N.J. 2013: PPPC- Peer-2-Peer Streaming and Algorithm for Creating Spanning Trees for Peer-2-Peer Networks Computational Methods in Applied Sciences: 363-377
Heinrich, M. 1976: Decisions of the BAG (Bunderarbeitsgericht = Federal Labor Court) concerning attempted suicide and alcoholism from the psychiatric viewpoint Der Nervenarzt 47(10): 596-603
Meadors, G. 2015: United States Supreme Court Decisions; Affordable Care Act Modification; IRS Determination Letter Program Journal of Medical Practice Management: Mpm 31(3): 165-166