Court decisions demonstrate new fairness
Ortolon, K.
Texas Medicine 89(2): 30-31
1993
ISSN/ISBN: 0040-4470 PMID: 8430383 Document Number: 412450
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-6542003: Court can make parental decisions Bulletin of medical ethics 2003(193): 4
Young, P.; Finn, B.ár.C.; Young, D.R. 2008: Court intervention in medical decisions and the generation of new conflicts Medicina 68(3): 266-267
Davidson, A.T.; Coleman, A.H. 1979: Recent interesting court decisions in malpractice cases Journal of the National Medical Association 71(11): 1133-1134
Raub, J.M.; Carson, N.J.; Cook, B.L.; Wyshak, G.; Hauser, B.B. 2013: Predictors of custody and visitation decisions by a family court clinic Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 41(2): 206-218
Jochemsen, H. 1998: Dutch court decisions on nonvoluntary euthanasia critically reviewed Issues in Law and Medicine 13(4): 447-458
Beatty, Y. 2010: Recent court decisions impact current peer review activity Tennessee medicine: journal of the Tennessee Medical Association 103(8): 17
Horty, J.F. 1981: Court shares burden with doctors of making life-and-death decisions Modern Healthcare 11(8): 144; 150
Heinrich, M. 1976: Decisions of the BAG (Bunderarbeitsgericht = Federal Labor Court) concerning attempted suicide and alcoholism from the psychiatric viewpoint Der Nervenarzt 47(10): 596-603
Meadors, G. 2015: United States Supreme Court Decisions; Affordable Care Act Modification; IRS Determination Letter Program Journal of Medical Practice Management: Mpm 31(3): 165-166
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Carlson, J.; Daly, R.; Zigmond, J. 2011: Appeals court blasts mandate. 11th circuit ruling sets up high court showdown Modern Healthcare 41(33): 4
Goh, A.T.; Mok, Q. 2000: Decisions to withdraw treatment. Most decisions are based on subjective appraisal Bmj 320(7226): 55
Teres, D. 1992: Les décisions de ne pas réanimer: la tendance actuelle aux Etats-Unis - Decisions not to resuscitate: current trend in United States les Decisions d'Arret Therapeutique en Reanimation 31(4): 301-304
Muldoon, K.A.; Duff, P.K.; Birungi, J.; Ngolobe, M.H.; Min, J.Eun.; King, R.; Nyonyintono, M.; Chen, Y.; Shannon, K.; Khanakwa, S.; Moore, D. 2014: Decisions, decisions: the importance of condom use decision making among HIV sero-discordant couples in a prospective cohort study in Uganda Sexually Transmitted Infections 90(5): 408-412
Kuruppu, J.; Novy, K.; Fetter, L.; Oo, S.; Hegarty, K. 2023: 'Family court…sucks out your soul': Australian general practitioners' experiences supporting domestic violence survivors through family court Bmc Primary Care 24(1): 95
Mary Duryee 1992: Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of one Court Service : Executive Summary Family Court Review 30(2): 260-267
Mary Duryee 1992: Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of one Court Service : Executive Summary Family Court Review 30(2): 260-267
Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
Flood, C.M.; Lewis, S. 2005: Courting trouble: the Supreme Court's embrace of private health insurance: use and misuse of social science evidence by the Supreme Court--how should Canadian governments respond? Healthcare Policy 1(1): 26-35