United States Supreme Court Decisions; Affordable Care Act Modification; IRS Determination Letter Program
Meadors, G.
Journal of Medical Practice Management Mpm 31(3): 165-166
2015
ISSN/ISBN: 8755-0229 PMID: 26856026 Document Number: 683579
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
Flood, C.M.; Lewis, S. 2005: Courting trouble: the Supreme Court's embrace of private health insurance: use and misuse of social science evidence by the Supreme Court--how should Canadian governments respond? Healthcare Policy 1(1): 26-35
Teres, D. 1992: Les décisions de ne pas réanimer: la tendance actuelle aux Etats-Unis - Decisions not to resuscitate: current trend in United States les Decisions d'Arret Therapeutique en Reanimation 31(4): 301-304
Podell, L.B. 1983: Recent supreme court antitrust rulings in health care American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 40(4): 639-641
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Gartner, E.C. 2007: The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care Medgenmed: Medscape General Medicine 9(3): 41; Author Reply 41
Blumenthal, P.D.; Winikoff, B. 2007: The supreme court and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care Medgenmed: Medscape General Medicine 9(2): 52
Hodson, T.J.; Englander, F.; Englander, V. 2001: Am i my brother's (or customer's or tenant's) keeper? Economic and ethical aspects to the California Supreme Court's struggle with the issue of landowner's standard of care Journal of Forensic Sciences 46(4): 986-993
Barrington, S 1833: Art. II. Facts and Observations relative to the Disease commonly called Yellow Fever; as it Appeared on Board the United States Ship Hornet in 1828, the United States Schooner Grampus in 1829, and at the United States Naval Hospital, Pensacola, in the Cases received from the Peacock, in 1830 American Journal of the Medical Sciences 12(24): 307-325
Miller, J.G.; Bersoff, D.M.; Harwood, R.L. 1990: Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: moral imperatives or personal decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(1): 33-47
Emilio, A.Bitencourt. 2011: Tripping over trips and the global HIV/AIDS epidemic: legislation and political decisions in Brazil and the United States Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 28(1): 57-85
Erikson, G.; Wahl, T.; Jussaume, R.; Shi, H. 1998: Product characteristics affecting consumers fresh beef cut purchasing decisions in the United States, Japan, and Australia Journal of food distribution research 29(3): 16-25
Zimmer, K.J. 2012: The Supreme Court has ruled...now what? South Dakota Medicine: the Journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association 65(8): 318-319
1997: Supreme Court finds no 'right to die' Minnesota Medicine 80(8): 39
Jones, R.M. 2012: Do the Supreme Court elections really matter? Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association 53(9): 302-304
Burda, D. 1990: Two Rockford hospitals appeal to Supreme Court Modern Healthcare 20(27): 3
Schulte, D.J. 2010: New Michigan Supreme Court disqualification rule Michigan Medicine 109(3): 5
Forsythe, C.D.; Kehr, B.N. 2019: A road map through the supreme court's back alley Issues in law & medicine 33(2): 175-205
Vaccaro, P.L.; Bryant, M.R. 1999: Supreme Court rulings favor employers Provider 25(8): 55; 57