Dutch court decisions on nonvoluntary euthanasia critically reviewed
Jochemsen, H.
Issues in Law and Medicine 13(4): 447-458
1998
ISSN/ISBN: 8756-8160 PMID: 9594456 Document Number: 485042
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654Sheldon, T. 1995: Dutch doctors tighten euthanasia guidelines Bmj 311(7007): 708
Sheldon, T. 2000: Euthanasia. Dutch fail to clarify nurses' position in mercy killings Nursing Times 96(49): 9
Daverschot, M.; van der Wal, H. 2001: The position of nurses in the new Dutch euthanasia bill: a report of legal and political developments Ethics and Medicine: a Christian Perspective on Issues in Bioethics 17(2): 85-92
2003: Court can make parental decisions Bulletin of medical ethics 2003(193): 4
Ortolon, K. 1993: Court decisions demonstrate new fairness Texas Medicine 89(2): 30-31
Mevius, L. 2015: Dutch government in court for violating international tobacco treaty Bmj 350: H2519
Young, P.; Finn, B.ár.C.; Young, D.R. 2008: Court intervention in medical decisions and the generation of new conflicts Medicina 68(3): 266-267
Davidson, A.T.; Coleman, A.H. 1979: Recent interesting court decisions in malpractice cases Journal of the National Medical Association 71(11): 1133-1134
van der Wal, G.; van der Maas, P.J.; Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B.D.; van der Heide, A. 2001: New research on the practice, reporting and reviewing of euthanasia and other medical end-of-life decisions, 2001/2002 Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 145(37): 1802-1806
Raub, J.M.; Carson, N.J.; Cook, B.L.; Wyshak, G.; Hauser, B.B. 2013: Predictors of custody and visitation decisions by a family court clinic Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 41(2): 206-218
Horty, J.F. 1981: Court shares burden with doctors of making life-and-death decisions Modern Healthcare 11(8): 144; 150
Beatty, Y. 2010: Recent court decisions impact current peer review activity Tennessee medicine: journal of the Tennessee Medical Association 103(8): 17
Augier, R.; Hambleton, I.R.; Harding, H. 2005: Triage decisions and outcome among the critically ill at the University Hospital of the West Indies West Indian Medical Journal 54(3): 181-186
Boluyt, N.; Bollen, C.W.; Bos, A.P.; Kok, J.H.; von Rosenstiel, I.A.; Offringa, M. 2006: The practice guideline 'Volume suppletion in critically-ill neonates and children up to the age of 18 years' of the Dutch Paediatric Association Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 150(44): 2421-2426
Heinrich, M. 1976: Decisions of the BAG (Bunderarbeitsgericht = Federal Labor Court) concerning attempted suicide and alcoholism from the psychiatric viewpoint Der Nervenarzt 47(10): 596-603
Meadors, G. 2015: United States Supreme Court Decisions; Affordable Care Act Modification; IRS Determination Letter Program Journal of Medical Practice Management: Mpm 31(3): 165-166
Provoost, V.; Pennings, G.; De Sutter, P.; Dhont, M. 2011: Decisions on embryo disposition in cross-border reproductive care: differences between Belgian and Dutch patients at a Belgian fertility center Facts Views and Vision in Obgyn 3(4): 293-301
Laux, J.; Röbel, A.; Parzeller, M. 2013: Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part II--Help in the dying process, direct and indirect active euthanasia Archiv für Kriminologie 231(1-2): 1-37
Dessaur, C.I.; Rutenfrans, C.J. 1988: Euthanasia in the Netherlands. the present day practice of euthanasia Issues in Law and Medicine 3(4): 399-405