Quality in healthcare in the United Kingdom: lessons for Australia
Duggan, J.M.
Medical Journal of Australia 170(3): 121-124
1999
ISSN/ISBN: 0025-729X PMID: 10065124 Document Number: 508157
The United Kingdom has a strong emphasis on quality in healthcare and clinical audit. Many quality activities are funded by the government but managed by professional bodies, a model that should be trialled in Australia.
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Alostad, A.H.; Steinke, D.T.; Schafheutle, E.I. 2018: International Comparison of Five Herbal Medicine Registration Systems to Inform Regulation Development: United Kingdom, Germany, United States of America, United Arab Emirates and Kingdom of Bahrain Pharmaceutical Medicine 32(1): 39-49Martín Zurro, A. 2002: Evaluation of postgraduate training and professional certification and re-certification of family doctors in various countries ( United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Holland, Australia and Spain) Atencion Primaria 30(1): 46-56
Armstrong, J. 1993: Making Community Involvement in Urban Regeneration Happen - Lessons from the United Kingdom Community Development Journal 28(4): 355-361
Lewsey, D.M.; Smith, S.R. 1996: Survival of family medicine in a corporate health care environment: lessons from the United Kingdom Journal of Family Practice 42(4): 409-416
Bullock, D.G. 1995: External quality assessment schemes for clinical chemistry in the United Kingdom Annali Dell'istituto Superiore di Sanita 31(1): 61-69
Richard, B.W.; Lasagna, L. 1987: Drug regulation in the United States and the United Kingdom: the Depo-Provera story Annals of Internal Medicine 106(6): 886-891
2012: Naming drug substances at the national level: mainly in the United Kingdom and the United States Prescrire International 21(132): 279
Blanchard, K.; Haskell, S.; Ferden, S.; Johnstone, K.; Spears, A.; Evans, M.; Leadbetter, C.; Carlson, S.; Meehan, A.; Abuabara, K.; Ellertson, C. 2002: Differences between emergency contraception users in the United States and the United Kingdom Journal of the American Medical Women's Association 57(4): 200-203; 214
Cherkassky, L. 2010: Rational rejection? the ethical complications of assessing organ transplant candidates in the United Kingdom and the United States Journal of Law and Medicine 18(1): 156-168
Spence, A.A.; Cohen, E.N.; Brown, B.W.; Knill-Jones, R.P.; Himmelberger, D.U. 1977: Occupational hazards for operating room-based physicians. Analysis of data from the United States and the United Kingdom JAMA 238(9): 955-959
Tenedios, C.; O'Leary, S.; Capocci, M.; Desai, S.P. 2018: History of anaesthesia: Nurse anaesthesia practice in the G7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States of America) European Journal of Anaesthesiology 35(3): 158-164
Manolakou, P.; Angelopoulou, R.; Lavranos, G. 2006: Sex determinants in the genome--lessons from the animal kingdom Collegium Antropologicum 30(3): 649-652
Hall, J. 2002: From the United Kingdom Midwifery Today with International Midwife 2002(61): 61-62
Remfry, J. 1996: Feral cats in the United Kingdom Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208(4): 520-523
Palmer, A. 1976: Malaria associated with pregnancy in the United Kingdom British Journal of Clinical Practice 30(1): 19-20
Frankland, A.W. 1993: Practice of allergy in the United Kingdom Annals of Allergy 71(4): 335-337
Court-Brown, C.; McQueen, M.M. 1997: Trauma management in the United Kingdom Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 79(1): 1-3
Rees, R. 1997: Complementary medicine in the United Kingdom Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine 3(3): 84-86
Hussein, F. 1999: Podiatric Medicine in the United Kingdom Saudi Medical Journal 20(12): 920-922
Tahrani, A.A.; Varughese, G.I.; Macleod, A.F. 2006: Pay-for-performance programs in the United Kingdom New England Journal of Medicine 355(17): 1832-1833; Author Reply 1833