Evaluation of coworkers. 1. the comparison with other coworkers is useful for all
Gremmel-Thomas, E.; Petrachi, F.
Pflege Zeitschrift 51(3): 205-208
1998
ISSN/ISBN: 0945-1129 PMID: 9588340 Document Number: 485896
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Baumgarten, M. 1996: Evaluation sheet for nursing coworkers in the hospital Pflege Zeitschrift 49(10): Suppl: 1-9Ott, E. 2003: Integrating new coworkers Kinderkrankenschwester: Organ der Sektion Kinderkrankenpflege 22(10): 421-423
Pradella, M. 1998: Management ideas and operating suggestions in the social field: coworkers are insiders Pflege Zeitschrift 51(3): 209-212
Mannweiler, E. 1991: The scientific accomplishments of coworkers of the Bernhard Nocht Institute between 1900 and 1960. A short historical review Zentralblatt für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin 192(3): 187-206
Sobkowicz, B.; Hirnle, T.; Harań, T.; Wrabec, K.; Mielecki, T. 2002: Usefulness of two-dimensional echocardiography for evaluation of left ventricular aneurysm. Comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative evaluation Przeglad Lekarski 59(8): 632-637
Giacchino, M.; Nigro, N.; Togliatto, G.; Pastorin, L.; Rota, A.; Orrù, D.; Benso, L. 1980: Evaluation of HGH secretion. Comparison of the Bovril and ITT tests Minerva Pediatrica 32(13): 853-854
Bai, S.L. 1986: Comparison of methods for the evaluation of obese children Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 20(1): 6-8
Zhou, J. 1995: Comparison and evaluation of the methods of diet survey Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 29(2): 111-113
Macarini, L.; Perrone, A.; Murrone, M.; Marini, S.; Stefanelli, M. 2004: Evaluation of patellar chondromalacia with MR: comparison between T2-weighted FSE SPIR and GE MTC La Radiologia Medica 108(3): 159-171
Furukawa, M.; Kazaka, S.; Kushibiki, K.; Ashida, Y.; Saito, H.; Yamamoto, H.; Furukawa, T. 1984: Clinical evaluation of CA 19-9 for the detection of malignant tumors--a comparison with CEA and IAP Gan no Rinsho. Japan Journal of Cancer Clinics 30(4): 357-362
Linnet, K. 1993: Evaluation of regression procedures for methods comparison studies Clinical Chemistry 39(3): 424-432
Yamazaki, Y.; Toma, H.; Nakazawa, H.; Nakamura, R.; Kato, N.; Ryoji, O. 1992: Evaluation of complicated renal cyst: a comparison of CT and MR imaging Hinyokika Kiyo. Acta Urologica Japonica 38(6): 635-640
Srisuttiyakorn, C.; Aunhachoke, K. 2016: Pathergy Test: the Comparison of Clinical vs. Histopathological Evaluation Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 99(4): 412-417
Elashoff, R.M.; Preston, D.L.; Fears, T.R. 1979: Comparison and evaluation of some experimental designs for use in carcinogen screening Journal of the National Cancer Institute 62(5): 1209-1219
Zabojszcz, W.; Zalewski, W.; Koziorowska, J. 1980: Comparison of three methods of toxicity evaluation of medical plastics Polish Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacy 32(1): 99-102
Ortolani, O.; Palmieri, P.; Lonardo, A.; Cianciulli, M.; Trebbi, A. 1983: Erythrocyte filtration in the evaluation of membrane deformability: a comparison between two methods Bollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale 59(3): 264-270
Garretti, L.; Fauciglietti, P.; Regge, D.; Bonino, F.; Brunetto, M.; Gandini, G. 1988: Evaluation of the usefulness of ultrasonics in the diagnosis of cancerous cirrhosis. Comparison with CT La Radiologia Medica 76(3): 187-192
Miklósné, H.M. 1978: Comparison of semiquantitative evaluation methods for serum lipoprotein levels Orvosi Hetilap 119(11): 667-668
Cazin, J.L.; Gosselin, P.; Boniface, B.; Demaille, M.C.; Demaille, A. 1992: An evaluation of CA 549, a circulating marker of breast cancer using a procedure for comparison with CA 15.3 Anticancer Research 12(3): 719-724
Di Iorio, C.; Marulli, P.L.; Caputo, M.; Rossi, A. 1980: Evaluation of sino-atrial function: comparison of 2 study methods Bollettino Della Societa Italiana di Cardiologia 25(3): 271-280