Comparison and evaluation of the methods of diet survey
Zhou, J.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 29(2): 111-113
1995
ISSN/ISBN: 0253-9624 PMID: 7796681 Document Number: 454602
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Goto, H.; Yuasa, K.; Sakamaki, H.; Nakata, K.; Komuro, I.; Iguchi, M.; Okamura, T.; Ieki, R.; Tanikawa, S.; Akiyama, H.; Onozawa, Y.; Mochida, Y. 1996: Rapid detection cytomegalovirus pneumonia in recipients of bone marrow transplant: evaluation and comparison of five survey methods for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid Bone Marrow Transplantation 17(5): 855-860Leinert, J.; Simon, I.; Hötzel, D. 1983: Methods and their evaluation for the estimation of vitamin B6 levels in man. 5. Serum pyridoxal-5-phosphate determination: method and comparison of methods International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research. Internationale Zeitschrift für Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal International de Vitaminologie et de Nutrition 53(2): 156-165
Sturm, B.; Albrecht, R.-Groos and Michael Seyfath 2002: Evaluation of New Oxidation Methods for the Measurement of Bilirubin on the Aeroset Clinical Chemistry Analyzer and Comparison with Methods on the Hitachi 717 Clinical Laboratory 48(7-8): 401-405
Bates, C.J.; Mansoor, M.A.; Gregory, J.; Pentiev, K.; Prentice, A. 2002: Correlates of plasma homocysteine, cysteine and cysteinyl-glycine in respondents in the British National Diet and Nutrition Survey of young people aged 4-18 years, and a comparison with the survey of people aged 65 years and over British Journal of Nutrition 87(1): 71-79
Jiang, Y.; Su, X.; Wang, D.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Cui, Y. 2014: Comparison on the satisfaction of public about the government's response to human avian influenza a (H7N9) though different survey methods Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 35(2): 218-220
Polesky, H.F.; Taswell, H.F. 1975: Evaluation of HBsAg detection methods from AABB-CAP survey data American Journal of Clinical Pathology 63(6 Suppl): 1002-1006
Bai, S.L. 1986: Comparison of methods for the evaluation of obese children Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 20(1): 6-8
Linnet, K. 1993: Evaluation of regression procedures for methods comparison studies Clinical Chemistry 39(3): 424-432
Zabojszcz, W.; Zalewski, W.; Koziorowska, J. 1980: Comparison of three methods of toxicity evaluation of medical plastics Polish Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacy 32(1): 99-102
Ortolani, O.; Palmieri, P.; Lonardo, A.; Cianciulli, M.; Trebbi, A. 1983: Erythrocyte filtration in the evaluation of membrane deformability: a comparison between two methods Bollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale 59(3): 264-270
Miklósné, H.M. 1978: Comparison of semiquantitative evaluation methods for serum lipoprotein levels Orvosi Hetilap 119(11): 667-668
Di Iorio, C.; Marulli, P.L.; Caputo, M.; Rossi, A. 1980: Evaluation of sino-atrial function: comparison of 2 study methods Bollettino Della Societa Italiana di Cardiologia 25(3): 271-280
Huhmann, W.; Duangphung, K. 1980: Left ventricular wall motion. a comparison of six evaluation methods Zeitschrift für Kardiologie 69(12): 818-826
Thongprachum, A.; Khamrin, P.; Tran, D.N.; Okitsu, S.; Mizuguchi, M.; Hayakawa, S.; Maneekarn, N.; Ushijima, H. 2012: Evaluation and Comparison of the Efficiency of Immunochromatography Methods for Norovirus Detection Clinical Laboratory 58(5-6): 489-493
Yu, S.; Pan, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhu, Y. 2010: Comparison of the software safety evaluation methods in medical devices Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 34(5): 360-364
Akhmatova, E.A. 1983: Comparison of the smear and rinsing methods for the evaluation of the autoflora composition of the skin Laboratornoe delo 1983(2): 41-42
Chivot, L.; Maillot-Vest, M.; Mainard, F.; Pare, J.M.; Massoubre, C.; Madec, Y. 1992: Serum myoglobin: evaluation of two immunolatex methods. Comparison with a radioimmunoassay method Annales de Biologie Clinique 50(3): 143-147
Vriens, D.; De Geus-Oei, L.F.; Van Laarhoven, H.W.M.; Van Der Heijden, H.F.M.; Krabbe, P.F.M.; Visser, E.P.; Oyen, W.J.G. 2010: Comparison of two region of interest definition methods for metabolic response evaluation with [¹⁸F]FDG-PET Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Official Publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine and the International Association of Radiopharmacology and Section of the Society Of. 54(6): 677-688
Rapezzi, C.; Maresta, A.; Melandri, G.; Tartagni, F.; Petronelli, F.; Magnani, B. 1981: Precordial mapping of the Frank ECG and QRS in evaluation of the infarct area: comparison between the 2 methods Bollettino Della Societa Italiana di Cardiologia 26(11): 1779-1787
Dufour, P.; Billa, J.P.; Fabre, J.; Roquebert, J. 1989: Evaluation of the central anticholinergic activity of antidepressants. Comparison of two experimental methods Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises 47(3): 135-141