Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarct--is it being used to the fullest?

Carôla, B.; Calçada-Correia, L.; Pedro, P.G.; Conduto, R.; Dionísio, I.; Fiuza, M.; Dias, E.; Vaz Carneiro, A.; Amador, M.G.; de Pádua, F.; Lopes, M.G.

Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia Orgao Oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia 15(12): 867

1996


ISSN/ISBN: 0870-2551
PMID: 9052962
Document Number: 465792
To evaluate the experience with thrombolytic therapy (TT) in the treatment of patients with the discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Retrospective analysis of the clinical records of patients with the discharge diagnosis of AMI, between May 1988 and December 1995. Intensive Cardiac Care Unit (UCIM-Medicina IV) of Santa Maria University Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal. 1319 patients, 958 men (73%) and 361 women, mean age 64 +/- 12 years. Thrombolytic therapy was administered in 391 patients (30%). Female patients received less thrombolytic therapy compared with male (17% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). Anterior wall infarction was more frequent (38%). Patients in Killip class I-II (77%) received more thrombolytic therapy than class III-IV (33% vs. 17%). The utilization rate of thrombolytic therapy increased from 25% in 1988 to 34% in 1995. Two major categories of patients were not treated with thrombolysis: 1) patients presented more than 12 hours after pain onset (38%); 2) patients without ST segment elevation or LBBB on the ECG presented (37%). Overall hospital mortality was 15.6%. The mortality in patients receiving thrombolytic therapy was significantly lower than in those excluded (9.4% vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001). Only 30% of patients with AMI receive TT. Of those excluded from this important therapeutic intervention, 75% had no ECG criteria or were outside the standard therapeutic "window". This significant group of patients need new diagnostic and intervention strategies.

Document emailed within 1 workday
Secure & encrypted payments