Small pontico with inlays
Ravasini, G.
Dental Cadmos 43(4): 554-558
1975
ISSN/ISBN: 0011-8524 PMID: 1073346 Document Number: 90772
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Burke, F.J.; Wilson, N.H.; Watts, D.C. 1994: Aesthetic inlays British Dental Journal 177(6): 198Kerschbaum, T.; Voss, R. 1981: Practical efficacy of crowns and inlays Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 36(4): 243-249
Rottstock, F. 1974: Rationalization of wax processing in the production of inlays Stomatologie der DDR 24(11): 774-777
Berland, L.; Kong, S.K. 2010: Same-day indirect ceramic polymer inlays/onlays Dentistry Today 29(6): 86; 88-89
Reinhardt, K.J. 1991: Extraoral post-curing of composite inlays Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 46(5): 342-345
Bernhart, J.; Schulze, D.; Wrbas, K.-T. 2009: Evaluation of the clinical success of Cerec 3D inlays International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 12(3): 265-277
Donly, K.J. 1990: Composite resin inlays: a single appointment technique American Journal of Dentistry 3(5): 181-184
Herder, S.M.; Roulet, J.F. 1988: Marginal adaptation of bonded Dicor inlays in vivo Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 43(8): 904-908
Howard, N.Y. 1996: Achieving predictable results with posterior inlays and onlays Dentistry Today 15(5): 76 78 80-1
Auzias, F.; Grass, J.L.; Medioni, E.; Vene, G. 1985: Inlays and onlays. Clinical trial with nonprecious alloys L' Information Dentaire 67(18): 1845-1849
Touati, B. 1996: The evolution of aesthetic restorative materials for inlays and onlays: a review Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry: Ppad 8(7): 657-666; Quiz 668
Frankenberger, R.; Taschner, M.; Garcia-Godoy, F.; Petschelt, A.; Krämer, N. 2008: Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 10(5): 393-398
Tidehag, P.; Gunne, J. 1995: A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays International Journal of Prosthodontics 8(5): 456-460
Cvetković, T. 1978: Some errors in fabrication of Class Ii inlays with double impressions of Optosil-Xantopren Stomatoloski Vjesnik. Stomatological Review 7(3-4): 35-38
Kreulen, C.M.; van Amerongen, W.E.; Gruythuysen, R.J.; Borgmeijer, P.J.; Akerboom, H.B. 1993: Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect Class Ii resin composite inlays Asdc Journal of Dentistry for Children 60(2): 95-98
Bottacchiari, S.; De Paoli, S.; Bottacchiari, P.A. 2011: Biologic restoration: the effects of composite inlays on patient treatment plans International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 31(2): 115-123
Hickel, R.; Kunzelmann, K.H. 1990: The influence of cavity preparation on the width of marginal gaps in Cerec inlays Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 45(10): 675-677
Titus, H.W.; Chan, D.C. 1992: A comparison of gingival marginal gap formation in composite inlays using three different fabrication techniques Texas Dental Journal 109(3): 13-16
Ohlmann, B.M.; Schmitter, M.; Gabbert, O.; Rammelsberg, P. 2007: Fracture load of fixed partial dentures anchored by composite inlays American Journal of Dentistry 20(6): 405-410
Otto, T. 2017: Up to 27-years clinical long-term results of chairside Cerec 1 CAD/CAM inlays and onlays International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 20(3): 315-329