Some errors in fabrication of Class Ii inlays with double impressions of Optosil-Xantopren
Cvetković, T.
Stomatoloski Vjesnik. Stomatological Review 7(3-4): 35-38
1978
ISSN/ISBN: 0350-5499 PMID: 392827 Document Number: 130645
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Titus, H.W.; Chan, D.C. 1992: A comparison of gingival marginal gap formation in composite inlays using three different fabrication techniques Texas Dental Journal 109(3): 13-16Glassman, S. 2009: Digital impressions for the fabrication of aesthetic ceramic restorations: a case report Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry: Ppad 21(1): 60-64
Garnier, B.; Bonifay, P.; Lefèvre, M.; Vincent, G.; L'Official-Vincent, M. 1989: Diagnostic wax models and direct impressions in prosthodontics. Importance, fabrication and utilization L' Information Dentaire 71(42): 4121-4129
Kreulen, C.M.; van Amerongen, W.E.; Gruythuysen, R.J.; Borgmeijer, P.J.; Akerboom, H.B. 1993: Prevalence of postoperative sensitivity with indirect Class Ii resin composite inlays Asdc Journal of Dentistry for Children 60(2): 95-98
Macpherson, J.R.; Davis, R.D.; Reagan, S.E.; Gray, S.E. 1994: Microleakage in heat-treated class V resin inlays cemented with five cement systems: an in vitro study General Dentistry 42(4): 310-316; Quiz: 317-318
Wang, X-Xia.; Zhao, G-Hua. 2010: A double labial-arch retaining appliance after correction of Class III osteal malocclusion Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 28(1): 109-110
Leibnitz, R.R.; Lipsky, P.E.; Thiele, D.L. 1995: Protection from T helper cell-mediated graft-versus-host disease by the presence of an MHC class I alloantigen is associated with perturbation of MHC class II-restricted responses by class I-derived peptides Journal of Immunology 155(4): 1784-1795
Gonçalves, F.S.; Leal, C.D.; Bueno, A.C.; Freitas, A.B.D.A.; Moreira, A.N.; Magalhães, C.áu.S. 2013: A double-blind randomized clinical trial of a silorane-based resin composite in class 2 restorations: 18-month follow-up American Journal of Dentistry 26(2): 93-98
Halimi, A.; Azeroual, M.F.; Abouqal, R.; Zaoui, F. 2011: A comparative study of the transverse dimensions of the dental arches between Class i dental occlusion and Class II1 and Class II2 malocclusions Odonto-Stomatologie Tropicale 34(136): 47-52
Field, T.E. 1964: Common Errors Occurring in the Diagnosis of Testicular Neoplasms and the Effect of these Errors on Prognosis Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps 110: 152-155
Markovits, P.; Contesso, G.; Bergiron, C.; Masselot, J.; Mouriesse 1972: Errors in the diagnosis of malignancy with mammography, apropos of 95 histologically verified errors Annales de Radiologie 15(11): 805-812
Stohwasser, R.; Soza, A.; Eggers, M.; Koszinowski, U.H.; Kloetzel, P.M. 2000: PA28alphabeta double and PA28beta single transfectant mouse B8 cell lines reveal enhanced presentation of a mouse cytomegalovirus (MCMV) pp89 MHC class I epitope Molecular Immunology 37(1-2): 13-19
Burke, F.J.; Wilson, N.H.; Watts, D.C. 1994: Aesthetic inlays British Dental Journal 177(6): 198
Ito, K. 1996: General tests--factors responsible for errors in sampling of urine, feces, cerebrospinal fluid, saliva, and other body fluids and prevention of these errors Rinsho Byori. Japanese Journal of Clinical Pathology Suppl. 103: 81-91
Ravasini, G. 1975: Small pontico with inlays Dental Cadmos 43(4): 554-558
Kerschbaum, T.; Voss, R. 1981: Practical efficacy of crowns and inlays Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 36(4): 243-249
Rottstock, F. 1974: Rationalization of wax processing in the production of inlays Stomatologie der DDR 24(11): 774-777
Bernhart, J.; Schulze, D.; Wrbas, K.-T. 2009: Evaluation of the clinical success of Cerec 3D inlays International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 12(3): 265-277
Berland, L.; Kong, S.K. 2010: Same-day indirect ceramic polymer inlays/onlays Dentistry Today 29(6): 86; 88-89
Reinhardt, K.J. 1991: Extraoral post-curing of composite inlays Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift 46(5): 342-345