Data-mining law struck down. Supreme court sides with drug companies in Vermont ruling
Carlson, J.
Modern Healthcare 41(26): 8-9
2011
ISSN/ISBN: 0160-7480 PMID: 21853604 Document Number: 648619
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Cossío-Díaz, J.é R.ón. 2010: The "morning after pill": the impact of the Supreme Court ruling in the medical field Gaceta Medica de Mexico 146(4): 251-256Freeman, J. 2013: ARNP supervision of fluoroscopy--considerations in light of the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling Iowa Medicine: Journal of the Iowa Medical Society 103(3): 22
Gale, A. 2012: How the Missouri Supreme Court ruling on caps on pain and suffering violates the people's right to self-governance Missouri Medicine 109(5): 338-340
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654
Zigmond, J.; Daly, R. 2012: Less than expected. with projections that the Supreme Court's ACA ruling means fewer will be insured, providers are scrambling to find out how they'll fare and sending PAC cash to those who can help Modern Healthcare 42(31): 6-7; 16, 1
Flood, C.M.; Lewis, S. 2005: Courting trouble: the Supreme Court's embrace of private health insurance: use and misuse of social science evidence by the Supreme Court--how should Canadian governments respond? Healthcare Policy 1(1): 26-35
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Carlson, J.; Daly, R.; Zigmond, J. 2011: Appeals court blasts mandate. 11th circuit ruling sets up high court showdown Modern Healthcare 41(33): 4
Pathak, J.; Kiefer, R.C.; Chute, C.G. 2013: Using linked data for mining drug-drug interactions in electronic health records Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 192: 682-686
Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
Chen, S-Jun.; Wei-Cai, -.; Li, Z-Hui. 2018: Drug-target network of taxanes revealed by data mining Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 31(2): 485-489
Zimmer, K.J. 2012: The Supreme Court has ruled...now what? South Dakota Medicine: the Journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association 65(8): 318-319
1997: Supreme Court finds no 'right to die' Minnesota Medicine 80(8): 39
Jones, R.M. 2012: Do the Supreme Court elections really matter? Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association 53(9): 302-304
Japsen, B. 1994: High court ruling may aid public hospitals Modern Healthcare 24(23): 14
Greene, J. 1994: Not-for-profit's switch hinges on court ruling Modern Healthcare 24(20): 20
Burda, D. 1991: Court ruling unleashes 47 union petitions Modern Healthcare 21(43): 6
Schulte, D.J. 2010: New Michigan Supreme Court disqualification rule Michigan Medicine 109(3): 5
Forsythe, C.D.; Kehr, B.N. 2019: A road map through the supreme court's back alley Issues in law & medicine 33(2): 175-205
Burda, D. 1990: Two Rockford hospitals appeal to Supreme Court Modern Healthcare 20(27): 3