How the Missouri Supreme Court ruling on caps on pain and suffering violates the people's right to self-governance
Gale, A.
Missouri Medicine 109(5): 338-340
2012
ISSN/ISBN: 0026-6620 PMID: 23097929 Document Number: 663799
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Cossío-Díaz, J.é R.ón. 2010: The "morning after pill": the impact of the Supreme Court ruling in the medical field Gaceta Medica de Mexico 146(4): 251-256Freeman, J. 2013: ARNP supervision of fluoroscopy--considerations in light of the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling Iowa Medicine: Journal of the Iowa Medical Society 103(3): 22
Carlson, J. 2011: Data-mining law struck down. Supreme court sides with drug companies in Vermont ruling Modern Healthcare 41(26): 8-9
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654
Zigmond, J.; Daly, R. 2012: Less than expected. with projections that the Supreme Court's ACA ruling means fewer will be insured, providers are scrambling to find out how they'll fare and sending PAC cash to those who can help Modern Healthcare 42(31): 6-7; 16, 1
Flood, C.M.; Lewis, S. 2005: Courting trouble: the Supreme Court's embrace of private health insurance: use and misuse of social science evidence by the Supreme Court--how should Canadian governments respond? Healthcare Policy 1(1): 26-35
Mudur, G. 1998: Indian Supreme Court rules that HIV positive people inform spouses Bmj 317(7171): 1474
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Carlson, J.; Daly, R.; Zigmond, J. 2011: Appeals court blasts mandate. 11th circuit ruling sets up high court showdown Modern Healthcare 41(33): 4
Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
Zimmer, K.J. 2012: The Supreme Court has ruled...now what? South Dakota Medicine: the Journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association 65(8): 318-319
1997: Supreme Court finds no 'right to die' Minnesota Medicine 80(8): 39
Jones, R.M. 2012: Do the Supreme Court elections really matter? Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Association 53(9): 302-304
Japsen, B. 1994: High court ruling may aid public hospitals Modern Healthcare 24(23): 14
Burda, D. 1991: Court ruling unleashes 47 union petitions Modern Healthcare 21(43): 6
Greene, J. 1994: Not-for-profit's switch hinges on court ruling Modern Healthcare 24(20): 20
Burda, D. 1990: Two Rockford hospitals appeal to Supreme Court Modern Healthcare 20(27): 3
Forsythe, C.D.; Kehr, B.N. 2019: A road map through the supreme court's back alley Issues in law & medicine 33(2): 175-205
Vaccaro, P.L.; Bryant, M.R. 1999: Supreme Court rulings favor employers Provider 25(8): 55; 57
Schulte, D.J. 2010: New Michigan Supreme Court disqualification rule Michigan Medicine 109(3): 5