Post-placental intrauterine device insertion vs puerperal insertion in women undergoing caesarean delivery in Egypt: a 1 year randomised controlled trial

Bayoumi, Y.A.; Dakhly, D.M.R.; Bassiouny, Y.A.; Gouda, H.M.; Hassan, M.A.; Hassan, A.A.

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care the Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception 25(6): 439-444

2020


ISSN/ISBN: 1473-0782
PMID: 33006501
DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1823366
Document Number: 581653
The aim of the study was to compare 6 month expulsion rates of the copper-bearing intrauterine device (IUD) inserted after delivery of the placenta or at the 6 week postpartum visit in women undergoing caesarean section. A parallel-group randomised trial was conducted in an Egyptian university hospital between February 2016 and December 2018. Participants were randomised to either post-placental IUD insertion or IUD insertion at the 6 week postpartum visit. Participants were followed for 12 months. Primary outcomes were IUD expulsion and the proportion of women using an IUD at 6 months. A secondary outcome was the cumulative pregnancy rate at 12 months. Five hundred participants were enrolled in each group. At 6 months the total expulsions were 58/416 (13.9%) in the post-placental group and 4/214 (1.9%) in the puerperal group; IUD use at 6 months was 416/478 (87.0%) in the post-placental group and 214/232 (92.2%) in the puerperal group. Data collected by phone at 12 months showed a higher cumulative pregnancy rate in the puerperal group (84/500, 16.8%) vs the post-placental group (22/500, 4.4%). IUD continuation at 12 months was higher in the post-placental group. Participants in the post-placental group had a higher expulsion rate at 6 months, but more IUDs were placed in this group and fewer pregnancies had occurred at 12 months compared with the puerperal group. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02679820.

Document emailed within 0-6 h
Secure & encrypted payments