Cardiovascular prevention, primary or secondary, in high risk patients
Richard, J.L.; Delahaye, F.
Archives des Maladies du Coeur et des Vaisseaux 91(12): 1495-1502
1998
ISSN/ISBN: 0003-9683 PMID: 9891833 Document Number: 492276
Two groups of patients admitted to hospital consecutively for coronary artery disease in 36 university hospital departments were interrogated about the advice received and followed concerning cardiovascular prevention both before the clinical onset of the disease (Group I), those with disease of less than one month duration (primary prevention), or after this period (Group II), those with disease for over six months (secondary prevention). The follow-up of risk factors or medical advice concerning prevention (dietary and/or treatment) was more common, and compliance to the advice was better, in secondary prevention. However, in both groups, with the exception of hypertension, the diagnosis and follow-up of the risk factors were incomplete with 19% vs 41% (p < or = 0.001) of serum cholesterol levels unmeasured before the onset of clinical disease; during the last 5 years, 41% vs 12% (cholesterol, p < or = 0.001) and 27% vs 9% (serum glucose, p < or = 0.001) were not checked. At least one measure of prevention had been advised to 66% vs 80% (p < or = 0.001) of patients and the measures taken concern 53 vs 75% (p < or = 0.001) of patients: serum cholesterol 27% vs 51% (p < or = 0.001), hypertension 32% vs 36% (NS) and serum glucose 14% vs 21% (p < or = 0.05). Compliance with advice was mediocre with regards to diet and cholesterol lowering drugs. A large proportion of patients in both groups had higher than recommended levels, including those on diet or treatment. These observations, confirmed in France and abroad, suggest that cardiovascular prevention should be better organised.