Who comes to a skin cancer screening--and why?
McMichael, A.J.; Jackson, S.
North Carolina Medical Journal 59(5): 294-297
1998
ISSN/ISBN: 0029-2559 PMID: 9785903 Document Number: 488385
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Waldmann, A.; Nolte, S.; Weinstock, M.A.; Breitbart, E.W.; Eisemann, N.; Geller, A.C.; Greinert, R.; Volkmer, B.; Katalinic, A. 2012: Skin cancer screening participation and impact on melanoma incidence in Germany--an observational study on incidence trends in regions with and without population-based screening British Journal of Cancer 106(5): 970-974Krol, S.; Keijser, L.M.; van der Rhee, H.J.; Welvaart, K. 1991: Screening for skin cancer in the Netherlands Acta Dermato-Venereologica 71(4): 317-321
Gauwerky, K.; Ruzicka, T.; Berking, C. 2009: Skin cancer screening at the family doctor's office MMW Fortschritte der Medizin 151(25): 38-42; quiz 43
Limpert, G.H. 1995: Skin-cancer screening: a three-year experience that paid for itself Journal of Family Practice 40(5): 471-475
Rance, B.R.; Elston, D.M. 2002: Disseminated coccidioidomycosis discovered during routine skin cancer screening Cutis 70(1): 70-72
Paskett, E.D.; Tatum, C.M.; D'Agostino, R.; Rushing, J.; Velez, R.; Michielutte, R.; Dignan, M. 1999: Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention: a Publication of the American Association for Cancer Research Cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 8(5): 453-459
Fukuyama, A.; Yokoyama, Y.; Wada, J.; Hashimoto, T.; Oda, T.; Sato, S.; Mizunuma, H. 2009: Two cases of ovarian cancer at an early stage incidentally detected using transvaginal ultrasonography in screening: importance of interval for ovarian cancer screening and selection of population with a high risk of ovarian cancer European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology 30(2): 208-210
Vogel, U.; Dybdahl, M.; Wallin, H.; Nexø, B.A. 2000: Treatment of psoriasis and skin cancer. Risk of skin cancer is affected by DNA repair capacity Ugeskrift for Laeger 162(50): 6861
de Koning, H.J. 1995: Screening for breast cancer, time to think--and stop? National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (NETB) Lancet 346(8972): 438-439
Roberts, D.L. 1995: Accuracy of local data on skin cancer. Skin cancer registry data may greatly underestimate cases Bmj 310(6990): 1327
Heal, C.; Raasch, B. 2008: Diagnosing skin cancer in primary care: how do main-stream general practitioners compare with primary care skin cancer clinic doctors? Medical Journal of Australia 188(2): 125; Author Reply 126
Bonneux, L.G.A.; Autier, P. 2011: Population-based breast cancer screening is not worthwhile. Screening has little effect on mortality Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 155(35): A3774
Catalona, W.J. 1997: Screening for prostate cancer. Early screening is important despite lack of data from trials Bmj 315(7101): 187
Berlin, N.I. 1981: Breast cancer screening: the case for screening women younger than 50 years JAMA 245(10): 1060
Sporea, I.; Popescu, A. 2014: No colorectal cancer screening program in Romania! Thus, start with opportunistic screening Revista Medico-Chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici Si Naturalisti Din Iasi 118(3): 598-600
Altarac, S. 2013: Individualized "opportunistic" screening for prostate cancer instead of mass population screening Lijecnicki Vjesnik 135(1-2): 51-52
Komeda, Y.; Suzuki, R.; Maeda, Y.; Okabe, S.; Kawamura, J.; Hioki, T.; Ohawa, M. 1994: Mass screening for prostate cancer at a local town--five-year results and screening system Hinyokika Kiyo. Acta Urologica Japonica 40(4): 315-318
Trehu, E.G.; Cooper, J.N. 1992: Cost of screening for colorectal cancer: results of a community mass screening program and review of the literature Southern Medical Journal 85(3): 248-254
1976: Cervical cancer screening programs. II. Screening for carcinoma of the cervix Canadian Medical Association Journal 114(11): 1013-1026
Watmough, D.J.; Kumar, K. 1994: Screening for breast cancer. Screening programme not cost effective Bmj 308(6922): 202