Court rules against force feeding
Dyer, C.
Bmj 307(6913): 1164-1165
1993
ISSN/ISBN: 0959-8138 PMID: 11643187 Document Number: 411153
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Robinson, M.L. 1981: California hospitals go to court over new rules Modern Healthcare 11(11): 15; 22Horty, J.F. 1979: Dying man can stop life support, court rules Modern Healthcare 9(3): 68; 70
Gottleib, S. 2000: Supreme Court rules that FDA cannot regulate tobacco industry Bmj 320(7239): 894
Brahams, D. 1985: Court of Appeals rules DHSS notice on family planning contrary to law Lancet 1(8419): 59-61
Mudur, G. 1998: Indian Supreme Court rules that HIV positive people inform spouses Bmj 317(7171): 1474
Benko, L.B. 2002: Which rules-state law or ERISA? Patients' rights case before high court could have big impact on HMO enrollees Modern Healthcare 32(3): 16
Kuwabara, H.; Honda, Y.; Makita, S.; Okabe, M.; Sumioka, R.; Kobayashi, H. 2009: What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice--court rules that overtime work must be included in gynecologist's normal working hours Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 110(6): 357-358
Lewey, L. 1977: Force-feeding-a clinical or administrative decision? Canadian Medical Association Journal 116(4): 416-419
Anonymous 1982: Policy statement based on Task Force report: the promotion of breast-feeding Pediatrics, USA 69(5): 654-661
Ouldzeidoune, N.; Keating, J.; Bertrand, J.; Rice, J. 2013: A description of female genital mutilation and force-feeding practices in Mauritania: implications for the protection of child rights and health Plos one 8(4): E60594
Ouldzeidoune, N.; Keating, J.; Bertrand, J.; Rice, J. 2013: A description of female genital mutilation and force-feeding practices in Mauritania: implications for the protection of child rights and health Plos one 8(4): E60594
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Carlson, J.; Daly, R.; Zigmond, J. 2011: Appeals court blasts mandate. 11th circuit ruling sets up high court showdown Modern Healthcare 41(33): 4
Chazard, E.; Ficheur, Gégoire.; Merlin, Béatrice.; Serrot, E.; Beuscart, Régis. 2009: Adverse drug events prevention rules: multi-site evaluation of rules from various sources Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 148: 102-111
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654
Kuruppu, J.; Novy, K.; Fetter, L.; Oo, S.; Hegarty, K. 2023: 'Family court…sucks out your soul': Australian general practitioners' experiences supporting domestic violence survivors through family court Bmc Primary Care 24(1): 95
Mary Duryee 1992: Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of one Court Service : Executive Summary Family Court Review 30(2): 260-267
Mary Duryee 1992: Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of one Court Service : Executive Summary Family Court Review 30(2): 260-267
Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
Flood, C.M.; Lewis, S. 2005: Courting trouble: the Supreme Court's embrace of private health insurance: use and misuse of social science evidence by the Supreme Court--how should Canadian governments respond? Healthcare Policy 1(1): 26-35