Which rules-state law or ERISA? Patients' rights case before high court could have big impact on HMO enrollees
Benko, L.B.
Modern Healthcare 32(3): 16
2002
ISSN/ISBN: 0160-7480 PMID: 11840846 Document Number: 548702
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Meadors, G.M. 2008: Major U.S. Supreme Court decision on participant remedies under ERISA Journal of Medical Practice Management: Mpm 24(1): 39-40Castellucci, M. 2017: Trump's high court nominee's opinions may signal opposition to abortion rights and assisted suicide Modern Healthcare 47(6): 10-11
Kuwabara, H.; Honda, Y.; Makita, S.; Okabe, M.; Sumioka, R.; Kobayashi, H. 2009: What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice--court rules that overtime work must be included in gynecologist's normal working hours Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 110(6): 357-358
Da Lomba, S. 2014: Vulnerability, irregular migrants' health-related rights and the European Court of Human Rights European Journal of Health Law 21(4): 339-364
Reddy, V. 1999: A blow to gender equality. Supreme Court judgement on Manushi's case on women's land rights Manushi 113: 24-25
Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
1999: Table of cases relating to sexual and reproductive rights--European Commission on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights Medicine and Law 18(2-3): 447-450
1999: Table of cases relating to sexual and reproductive rights--European Commission on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights Medicine and Law 18(2-3): 447-450
Carlson, J.; Daly, R.; Zigmond, J. 2011: Appeals court blasts mandate. 11th circuit ruling sets up high court showdown Modern Healthcare 41(33): 4
González, A.Cristina.; Durán, J. 2011: Impact of court rulings on health care coverage: the case of HIV/AIDS in Colombia Medicc Review 13(3): 54-57
Dyer, C. 1993: Court rules against force feeding Bmj 307(6913): 1164-1165
Robinson, M.L. 1981: California hospitals go to court over new rules Modern Healthcare 11(11): 15; 22
Lennon, M.A.; Castle, P.D. 2011: High court rejects anti-fluoridation case Community Dental Health 28(1): 63
Grosskopf, A.; Mondak, J.J. 1998: Do Attitudes Toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? the Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633-654
Horty, J.F. 1979: Dying man can stop life support, court rules Modern Healthcare 9(3): 68; 70
Gottleib, S. 2000: Supreme Court rules that FDA cannot regulate tobacco industry Bmj 320(7239): 894
Kaplina, O.V.; Sharenko, S.L.; Shumylo, N.Y. 2019: Medical errors: patients' opinion, lawyers' standpoint, medical doctrine and practice of the european court of human rights Wiadomosci Lekarskie 72(12 Cz 2: 2416-2420
Mudur, G. 1998: Indian Supreme Court rules that HIV positive people inform spouses Bmj 317(7171): 1474
Brahams, D. 1985: Court of Appeals rules DHSS notice on family planning contrary to law Lancet 1(8419): 59-61
Scheibel, E.; Ingerslev, J.; Dalsgaard-Nielsen, J.; Stenbjerg, S.; Knudsen, J.B. 1987: Continuous high-dose factor VIII for the induction of immune tolerance in haemophilia A patients with high responder state: a description of eleven patients treated Thrombosis and Haemostasis 58(4): 1049-1052