Pro and cons of the use of antibiotic combinations
Van Miert, A.S.
Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde 101(19): 1101-1103
1976
ISSN/ISBN: 0040-7453 PMID: 136063 Document Number: 98829
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Rustenbeck, I. 2009: Fixed drug combinations--the pros and the cons Medizinische Monatsschrift für Pharmazeuten 32(4): 141-146Campos, M.E.; Rabinovich, S.; Smith, I.M. 1974: Therapy of experimental staphylococcal infection with antibiotic combinations Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 83(2): 241-248
Fosse, T.; Thyrion, X.; Gouverné, J. 1986: Antibiotic combinations and serum concentrations: a study using a computer program Pathologie-Biologie 34(9): 997-1000
Bretschneider, M.; Sandow, D.; Patsch, R.; Nguyen, T.M. 1991: Rapid photometric method for determination of in vitro effectiveness of various antibiotic combinations Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete 37(2): 84-87
Bowring, A.R.; Mackay, D.; Taylor, F.R. 1984: The treatment of napkin dermatitis: a double-blind comparison of two steroid-antibiotic combinations Pharmatherapeutica 3(9): 613-617
Barth, X.; Hayoun, H.; Rat, P.; Hoen, J.P.; Favre, J.P.; Lombard-Platet, R. 1991: Comparison of 2 antibiotic combinations used for peritonitis. Cefotaxime-clindamycin versus cefotaxime-metronidazole Presse Medicale 20(2): 57-60
Fanaki, N.H.; El-Nakeeb, M.A. 1996: Antibacterial activity of benzydamine and antibiotic-benzydamine combinations against multifold resistant clinical isolates Arzneimittel-Forschung 46(3): 320-323
Kouda, M. 1993: In vitro effects of combinations of antibiotics against highly-fosfomycin-resistant, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. With special reference to efficacies of combinations of imipenem/cilastatin and cephems Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 46(2): 142-153
Wierup, M.; Larsson, K.; Holtenius, P.; Jacobsson, S.O.; Månsson, I. 1975: The effect of antibiotic supplementation on antibiotic resistance, transferable antibiotic resistance, morbidity, and growth in calves Nordisk Veterinaermedicin 27(5): 253-265
Kuipers, J.S. 1976: Combinations of antimicrobial agents. III. the in vitro sensitivity of 12 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 12 strains of proteus species ot sulphamethoxazole + trimethoprim (co-trimoxazole), polymyxins and combinations of co-trimoxazole and polymyxins Archivum Chirurgicum Neerlandicum 28(2): 91-99
Sobue, T. 2014: CONs Gan to Kagaku Ryoho. Cancer and ChemoTherapy 41(5): 553-557
Dinh, A.K. 2007: Weighing the pros and cons of IM Journal of Ahima 78(8): 58-59; Quiz: 65-66
Kenéz, J. 1974: Pros and cons in the evaluation of DDT Orvosi Hetilap 115(20): 1177-1181
Witte, C.L.; Witte, M.H. 1978: Surgical pros and cons Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics 147(6): 915-917
Offerhaus, L. 1988: Glafenine: more cons than pros? Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 132(40): 1853-1857
McSwain, N.E. 1973: Surgical pros and cons Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics 137(1): 94
Knowles, J.H. 1972: Surgical pros and cons Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics 135(3): 432-433
Soxman, J.A. 2015: The pros and cons of third molar extractions General Dentistry 63(3): 12-13
Donas, K.P.; Torsello, G.; Bisdas, T. 2012: New EVAR devices: pros and cons Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 53(5): 559-569
Reed, L. 1993: Pros and cons associated with early-age neutering Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 202(11): 1788-1789