Against the rules. Proposed not-for-profit regulations draw complaints
Barr, P.
Modern Healthcare 42(40): 10
2012
ISSN/ISBN: 0160-7480 PMID: 23163218 Document Number: 657613
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Greenberg, D.S. 1996: Proposed US misconduct rules draw opposition Lancet 347(9013): 1475Barr, P. 2012: Pushing back. Proposed Medicare cuts to rural hospitals draw fire Modern Healthcare 42(18): 12-13
Limbacher, P.B. 1998: Facing a test. IRS may reinstate old rules for not-for-profit 401(k)s Modern Healthcare 28(4): 68
Ragan, C.A. 1975: Right to prescribe at issue in proposed "MAC" regulations Medical Times 103(4): 23; 25
Thallner, K.A. 1994: New safe harbor regulations proposed Delaware Medical Journal 66(9): 495-497
James-Hartwell, L. 1998: Should the proposed changes in the OPTN regulations include kidneys? Nephrology News and Issues 12(8): 26; 31
Davis, J.P. 1998: Fraud and abuse. Understanding the Stark Ii proposed regulations Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 52(4): 65-69
Burda, D. 1990: Proposed rules broaden anti-kickback law Modern Healthcare 20(21): 40
Fong, T. 2004: Rules and regulations. CMS addresses drug prices, payment rates Modern Healthcare 34(31): 8-9 13
Conn, J. 2010: Relieved over relaxed rules. Vendors say final regulations are less cumbersome Modern Healthcare 40(29): 7; 14
Bailes, J.S. 1998: Health-Care Financing Administration's proposed regulations to implement Stark Ii Oncology 12(11a): 364-365
Mayne, T.J. 2009: Highlights of the CMS proposed rules for the prospective payment of dialysis Nephrology News and Issues 23(11): 34 36 38
Edelstein, S.A. 2006: Proposed rules for electronic medical records and e-prescribing: do they go far enough Managed Care Interface 19(3): 47-51
Pelfrey, S. 1990: How proposed financial statement rules would affect hospitals Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 44(2): 54 57 62 Passim
Gabow, P. 2009: Follow the evidence. Administrative rules, regulations should get comparative-effectiveness treatment Modern Healthcare 39(50): 25
Shultz, P.T.; Langan, M.J. 1989: Current developments in employee benefits. The IRS issues proposed Section 89 and cafeteria plan regulations Employee Relations Law Journal 15(1): 135-145
Haas, M. 1998: Playing by the rules: dialysis facilities must heed disabilities act, fire safety regulations Nephrology News and Issues 12(6): 27-30; 32
Campbell, R.A. 1989: NLRB proposed rules for determining health care bargaining units Employee Relations Law Journal 14(4): 627-632
Welin, S. 2000: More stringent rules concerning xenotransplantation proposed in a report: the risk of severe infection can not be excluded Lakartidningen 97(16): 1926-1928
1989: Act No. 25155 of 26 December 1989 prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex in regulations, statutes, and other rules of sporting, social, and cultural institutions Annual Review of Population Law 16: 132