Intrauterine devices that do not fit well cause side effects, become embedded, or are expelled and can even perforate the uterine wall
Wildemeersch, D.; Hasskamp, T.; Goldstuck, N.
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 22(2): 309-310
2015
ISSN/ISBN: 1553-4669 PMID: 25283708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.09.010Document Number: 636365
Document emailed within 0-6 h
Related Documents
Heinemann, K.; Reed, S.; Moehner, S.; Minh, T.D. 2015: Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices Contraception 91(4): 274-279Hagenfeldt, K. 1980: Prostaglandins: mechanism of action and side effects of intrauterine devices Contraception Fertilite Sexualite 8(9): 669-673
Zhang, L.J.; Weng, L.J. 1994: Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 29(8): 481
Zhang, L.J.; Weng, L.J. 1994: Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 29(8): 481
Zhang, L.J.; Weng, L.J. 1994: Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 29(8): 481
Zhang, L.J.; Weng, L.J. 1994: Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 29(8): 481
Zhang, L.J.; Weng, L.J. 1994: Multiload Cu250 intrauterine devices and VCu200 intrauterine devices for women with previous failure of stainless steel ring intrauterine devices: a 5-year randomized clinical trial Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 29(8): 481
Siegler, A.M.; Kemmann, E. 1976: Location and removal of misplaced or embedded intrauterine devices by hysteroscopy Journal of Reproductive Medicine 16(3): 139-144
Mutlu, I.; Demir, A.; Mutlu, M.F. 2014: Can uterine artery Doppler parameters predict copper intrauterine device-induced side effects? European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care: the Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception 19(1): 51-56
Shipp, T.D.; Bromley, B.; Benacerraf, B.R. 2010: The width of the uterine cavity is narrower in patients with an embedded intrauterine device (IUD) compared to a normally positioned IUD Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 29(10): 1453-1456
Shin, D.G.; Kim, T.N.; Lee, W. 2012: Intrauterine device embedded into the bladder wall with stone formation: laparoscopic removal is a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery International Urogynecology Journal 23(8): 1129-1131
Haimovich, L.; Remedio, M.R.; Rozada, H.; Gil, B.E.; Blanco, Y.S. 1970: Uterine contractility in women using intrauterine devices Journal of Reproductive Medicine 5(6): 248-256
Kaislasuo, J.; Suhonen, S.; Gissler, M.; Lähteenmäki, P.; Heikinheimo, O. 2013: Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment Human Reproduction 28(6): 1546-1551
Rowlands, S.; Oloto, E.; Horwell, D.H. 2016: Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives Open Access Journal of Contraception 7: 19-32
Obradović, D.; Husar, M.; Andelković, V.; Krstić, M.; Ananijević-Pandey, J.; Tufegdzić, N. 1982: Study of pH values of uterine fluid in users of medicated intrauterine devices Jugoslavenska Ginekologija i Opstetricija 22(3-4): 70-74
Janakiraman, K.; Buch, N.C. 1973: Effect of intrauterine devices on uterine structure in goats. 3. Myometrial characteristics Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 11(3): 157-159
Heinemann, K.; Reed, S.; Moehner, S.; Minh, T.D. 2015: Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices Contraception 91(4): 280-283
Heinemann, K.; Reed, S.; Moehner, S.; Minh, T.D. 2015: Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices Contraception 91(4): 280-283
Doyle, L.L. 1975: Hormone-releasing silicone-rubber intrauterine contraceptive devices. Effect of incorporation of various compounds on intrauterine contraceptive devices in rats American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 121(3): 405-411
Doyle, L.L. 1975: Hormone-releasing silicone-rubber intrauterine contraceptive devices. Effect of incorporation of various compounds on intrauterine contraceptive devices in rats American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 121(3): 405-411