Fatal decision. Court encourages practice fee refusal
Schmidt, K.
MMW Fortschritte der Medizin 147(13): 50-51
2005
ISSN/ISBN: 1438-3276 PMID: 15832763 Document Number: 592321
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-31986: Gramm-Rudman-Hollings and the Supreme Court decision Provider 12(9): 39-40
Ulrich, B. 2001: Hospital physicians--overtime--European Court decision Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 72(10): Suppl: 276-278
Sutter, R.N. 1991: Court rejects HCFA's unnecessary borrowing decision Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 45(7): 94
Weber, R.D. 1994: Court of appeals decision in "Premier Plus" has wide ramifications Michigan Medicine 93(12): 9
De Kruif, A.; Verdonck, M. 2004: The job and the way of working of the veterinarians in mass vaccination: what is the decision of the court? Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde 129(14-15): 474-481
Meadors, G.M. 2008: Major U.S. Supreme Court decision on participant remedies under ERISA Journal of Medical Practice Management: Mpm 24(1): 39-40
Johansson, H. 1979: Labor Court decision: will we be able to schedule for a continuous 3-shift cover? Vardfacket 3(10): 16-20
Parmer-Larochelle, C. 1989: Supreme Court decision affects Medicare payment policies Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 43(2): 61-62
Grosskopf, V. 1999: Decision by the Federal Finance Court: home nursing service is a business Pflege Zeitschrift 52(8): 566-569
Horty, J. 1986: Michigan appellate court upholds peer review committee's decision Modern healthcare 16(1): 118-119
Charo, R.Alta. 2014: The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception JAMA Internal Medicine 174(10): 1537-1538
Heberer, J. 2003: Stand-by service as work time: does everything remain the same after the decision of the Federal Labor Court? Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 74(3): M78-M79
Cacciatore, G.G. 1996: Advertising, computers, and pharmacy liability. A Michigan court's decision has ramifications for pharmaceutical care Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association Ns36(11): 651-654
Soutoul, J.H.; Pierre, F. 1986: Technical autonomy with medicolegal risk for the midwife. Reflections on a decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals, 13 December 1983 Revue Francaise de Gynecologie et d'Obstetrique 81(3): 167-169
Stocker, H.A. 1986: Unresolved questions of farm law following from the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court on paragraph 1376 of section 4 of the Civil Code Agrarrecht 16(3): 65-69
Rieger, H.J. 2001: What may the insurance carrier change in the contract of the medical department head? Decision of the Hameln court 23 November 1998 Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 126(10): 283-284
Andreas, M.; Debong, B. 1997: Prevention of thrombosis with the walking cast--patient education regarding risks and treatment alternatives. Decision of the federal court 21 November 1995--VI ZR 329/94 Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 68(2): Suppl. 53-4
Karimy, M.; Niknami, S.; Heidarnia, A.R.; Hajizadeh, E.; Shamsi, M. 2013: Refusal self efficacy, self esteem, smoking refusal skills and water pipe (Hookah) smoking among iranian male adolescents Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: Apjcp 14(12): 7283-7288
Pincus, R.C. 1993: Has informed consent finally arrived in Australia? A comment on the law following the decision of the High Court of Australia in Rogers v. Whitaker Medical Journal of Australia 159(1): 25-27