Hospital physicians--overtime--European Court decision
Ulrich, B.
Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 72(10) Suppl: 276-278
2001
ISSN/ISBN: 0009-4722 PMID: 11715629 Document Number: 539565
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
2004: European court. Drug budgets of physicians remain reduced MMW Fortschritte der Medizin 146(13): 57Duffy, J. 1986: Supreme Court upholds District Court's Gramm-Rudman decision Health Law Vigil 9(14): 1-3
Kuwabara, H.; Honda, Y.; Makita, S.; Okabe, M.; Sumioka, R.; Kobayashi, H. 2009: What we can learn from a case of medical malpractice--court rules that overtime work must be included in gynecologist's normal working hours Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 110(6): 357-358
Dagan, N. 2020: The Janus face of imprisonment: Contrasting judicial conceptions of imprisonment purposes in the European Court of Human Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States Criminology-Criminal Justice 21(5): 633-649
Reilly, P. 2003: Overtime threat. Proposed regulation could limit nurses' overtime Modern Healthcare 33(27): 10-11
Andruszkiewicz, Pł.; Kański, A.; Konopka, P. 2010: Resuscitation decision in cases of hospital cardiac arrest--current practices and opinions of physicians Anestezjologia Intensywna Terapia 42(1): 19-23
1999: Table of cases relating to sexual and reproductive rights--European Commission on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights Medicine and Law 18(2-3): 447-450
1999: Table of cases relating to sexual and reproductive rights--European Commission on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights Medicine and Law 18(2-3): 447-450
Kahlert, W.H. 1973: Not a classless hospital, but--a single class hospital along with all the physicians. Models of physicians cooperation in the future Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin 49(5): 229-230
De Kruif, A.; Verdonck, M. 2004: The job and the way of working of the veterinarians in mass vaccination: what is the decision of the court? Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde 129(14-15): 474-481
1986: Gramm-Rudman-Hollings and the Supreme Court decision Provider 12(9): 39-40
Schmidt, K. 2005: Fatal decision. Court encourages practice fee refusal MMW Fortschritte der Medizin 147(13): 50-51
Weber, R.D. 1994: Court of appeals decision in "Premier Plus" has wide ramifications Michigan Medicine 93(12): 9
Sutter, R.N. 1991: Court rejects HCFA's unnecessary borrowing decision Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 45(7): 94
Meadors, G.M. 2008: Major U.S. Supreme Court decision on participant remedies under ERISA Journal of Medical Practice Management: Mpm 24(1): 39-40
Parmer-Larochelle, C. 1989: Supreme Court decision affects Medicare payment policies Healthcare Financial Management: Journal of the Healthcare Financial Management Association 43(2): 61-62
Johansson, H. 1979: Labor Court decision: will we be able to schedule for a continuous 3-shift cover? Vardfacket 3(10): 16-20
Grosskopf, V. 1999: Decision by the Federal Finance Court: home nursing service is a business Pflege Zeitschrift 52(8): 566-569
Horty, J. 1986: Michigan appellate court upholds peer review committee's decision Modern healthcare 16(1): 118-119
Shylo, O.H.; Glynska, N.V.; Marochkin, O.I. 2019: Criteria for recognition of appropriate medical assistance to detainees in the european human rights court's practice Wiadomosci Lekarskie 72(12 Cz 2: 2585-2590