Microbial evaluation of reusable and disposable laparotomy sponges
French, M.L.; Ritter, M.A.; Eitzen, H.E.; Hart, J.B.
Surgery Gynecology and Obstetrics 137(3): 465-466
1973
ISSN/ISBN: 0039-6087 PMID: 4578740 Document Number: 57834
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Clark, C. 1989: Reusable or disposable theatre linen--which is best? Professional Nurse 4(4): 183-185Voyles, C.R. 1993: Reusable vs. disposable laparoscopic instruments Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons 78(9): 38-39
DiGiacomo, J.C.; Odom, J.W.; Ritota, P.C.; Swan, K.G. 1992: Cost containment in the operating room: use of reusable versus disposable clothing American Surgeon 58(10): 654-656
Danchaivijitr, S.; Chuenarom, W.; Kachintorn, K.; Tangtrakul, T. 1992: Comparison of costs for disposable and reusable syringes and needles in Siriraj Hospital Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 75(Suppl 2): 11-15
Nezhat, F.R.; Silfen, S.L.; Evans, D.; Nezhat, C. 1991: Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle Obstetrics and Gynecology 78(1): 148-150
Nezhat, F.R.; Silfen, S.L.; Evans, D.; Nezhat, C. 1991: Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle Obstetrics and Gynecology 78(1): 148-150
Ahern, C.P.; Jennings, J.J. 1976: The bacteriology of vaginal mucus and intravaginal sponges from sheep and the effect of coating sponges with antibacterial agents Irish Veterinary Journal 30(8): 111-117
Davies, M.J. 1992: Assessment of the use of disposable skin staplers in bowel anastomoses to reduce laparotomy time in penetrating ballistic injury to the abdomen Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 74(1): 74
Howell, G.P.; Ryan, J.M.; Morgans, B.T.; Cooper, G.J. 1991: Assessment of the use of disposable skin staplers in bowel anastomoses to reduce laparotomy time in penetrating ballistic injury to the abdomen Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 73(2): 87-90
Mitrano, F.P.; Baptista, R.J.; Newton, D.W.; Augustine, S.C. 1986: Microbial contamination potential of solutions in prefilled disposable syringes used with a syringe pump American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 43(1): 78-80
Velecký, R.; Macek, M. 1970: Microbiological and pathologico-histological evaluation of the viscous sponges used in surgery as tampons Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete 16(2): 104-106
Yang, H. 2010: The effect of evidence-based evaluation and economic evaluation for price control of medical disposable materials Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi 34(3): 221-223
Barnes, T.A.; McGarry, W.P. 1990: Evaluation of ten disposable manual resuscitators Respiratory Care 35(10): 960-968
Luskin, R.L.; Weinstein, R.A.; Nathan, C.; Chamberlin, W.H.; Kabins, S.A. 1986: Extended use of disposable pressure transducers. A bacteriologic evaluation JAMA 255(7): 916-920
Hoenich, N.A.; Kerr, D.N. 1975: A comparative evaluation of three high efficiency disposable dialyzers Clinical Nephrology 3(6): 211-216
Bergmann, H.J. 1979: Evaluation of the contamination degree of plastic disposable syringes following flooding accidents Zeitschrift für Arztliche Fortbildung 73(2): 88-91
Tsujiguchi, N.; Fujita, S.; Kawamata, T.; Omote, K.; Matsumoto, M.; Namiki, A. 2000: Clinical evaluation of accuracy of a new disposable pump (Syrinjector) for continuous epidural infusion Masui. Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 49(2): 177-180
Singer, E.R.; Livesey, M.A. 1997: Evaluation of exploratory laparotomy in young horses: 102 cases (1987-1992) Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 211(9): 1158-1162
Van Beek, J.J.; Vollaard, E.S. 2005: Fertility after treatment for ectopic pregnancy: evaluation of the switch from laparotomy to laparascopy Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 149(8): 407-412
Oleszczuk, J.; Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B.; Kamiński, K.; Baranowski, W.ło. 2002: Evaluation of ovarian cysts by means of transabdominal fine needle aspiration or laparotomy in pregnant women Ginekologia Polska 73(4): 367-370