Many reports of RCTs give insufficient data for Cochrane reviewers
Walters, E.H.; Walters, J.A.
Bmj 319(7204): 257
1999
ISSN/ISBN: 0959-8138 PMID: 10417104 Document Number: 499941
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Kumar, P.D. 1999: How do peer reviewers of journal articles perform? Evaluating the reviewers with a sham paper Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 47(2): 198-200Löfmark, R.; Killander, A.; Wallentin, L. 1996: Why was myocardial infarction missed? 5 years of reports to the HSAN give a hint Lakartidningen 93(19): 1827-1829
Spiegel, P.B.; Cornier, N.; Schilperoord, M. 2009: Funding for reproductive health in conflict and post-conflict countries: a familiar story of inequity and insufficient data PLOS Medicine 6(6): E1000093
Bolinder, G.; Holm, L.E. 1991: Why do physicians hesitate to give advice on smoking cessation? Tips on suitable occasions to give information in 24 different specialties Lakartidningen 88(48): 4164-4169
El-Masri, M.M. 2015: Blinding in RCTs Canadian Nurse 111(2): 9
Teichert, M.; Lüer, A.K.; Stichtenoth, D.O. 2008: To give or not to give? Towards the indication of CSE inhibitors ("statins") Medizinische Monatsschrift für Pharmazeuten 31(5): 184-185
Wickham, S. 2006: RCTs and cessation frustration Practising Midwife 9(2): 35
Blaauwgeers, J.L.G.H. 2010: Pathology also subject to RCTs Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 154: A2274
Nexø, E.; Brydensholt, H.H. 1997: Guidelines for the presentation of experimental protocols and reports, data documentation and data storage in basic health research.Danish Medical Research Council and Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty Danish Medical Bulletin 44(1): 87-88
Zamami, M.; Igarashi, T. 1987: Analysis and evaluation of case reports by students and a discussion on focal points in the preparation of the reports--comments on the reports presented at the past 14 issues Kurinikaru Sutadi 8(3): 296-302
Pollard, A.J. 2012: Non-specific effects of vaccines: RCTs, not observational studies, are needed Archives of Disease in Childhood 97(8): 677-678
Gaertner, D.J. 2002: An ode to reviewers, and other things Contemporary topics in laboratory animal science 41(3): 8
Nadalin, V.; Bentvelsen, K.; Kreiger, N. 2004: Reliability of self-reports: data from the Canadian Multi-Centre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) Chronic Diseases in Canada 25(2): 28-31
Fibbi, L.; Canevini, P.; Spinelli, M. 1979: Evaluation of the reliability of the data from death certificates and anatomopathological reports compiled in a cancer registry Pathologica 71(1015): 683-688
Galeone, M.; Bossi, M.; Ferrante, F.; Cacioli, D.; Vianini, R.; Fortuna, F. 1987: Computerized system for filing clinical data and the automated preparation of reports on surgical patients Minerva Chirurgica 42(9): 829-834
Blumberg, S.J.; Cynamon, M.L.; Osborn, L.; Olson, L. 2003: The impact of touch-tone data entry on reports of HIV and STD risk behaviors in telephone interviews Journal of Sex Research 40(2): 121-128
Ang, R.P. 2003: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs)--sample size: the magic number (SMJ Vol 44 Issue 4 April 2003) Singapore Medical Journal 44(8): 432
Klemfuss, H.; Dess, N.K.; Brandon, S.E.; Garrison, H.H.; Pitts, M. 2001: Assessing the reviewers of animal research Science 294(5548): 1831-1832
Rumboldt, Z. 2008: Some hints about the reviewers' ethical dilemmas Acta medica Croatica: casopis Hravatske akademije medicinskih znanosti 62(5): 443-446
Westfall, G. 1979: Uniform reporting for rate reviewers Topics in Health Care Financing 6(2): 47-57