Appendectomy: evaluation of medical record maintenance in a series of 200 cases
Duhamel, P.; Chapuis, F.; Neidhardt, J.P.; Lauro, C.; Isaac, S.; Caillot, J.L.; Voiglio, E.J.
Annales de Chirurgie 52(9): 896-904
1998
ISSN/ISBN: 0003-3944 PMID: 9882879 Document Number: 491159
To improve the management of appendicular syndromes, two hundred files of patients undergoing appendectomy in an emergency surgery department between January 1993 and August 1994 were submitted to a retrospective and descriptive study with evaluation of the medical file content. To evaluate clinical and investigations data collecting, a histopathological review protocol was elaborated to obtain an objective and reliable criterion of the degree of inflammation of the appendix. This review was possible only for 197 files that were included. Data collecting rates are inferior than expected rates, particularly for the association of temperature, abdominal defence and white blood cells count that was found in only 159 files (80.7%). Data were less collected for women, patients operated by celioscopy and when histopathologic review concluded to absence of acute inflammation. Rate of acute appendicitis was 73.6% (145/197). Appendectomies without acute inflammation were higher for women (34.6% = 37/107) than for men (16.7% = 15/90) and for patients who underwent celioscopic appendectomy (42.9% = 33/77) than for patients who underwent Mac Burney appendectomy (16% = 19/119). These results highlight the need to improve competition of medical files with better collection of clinical data, which could lead to improve care quality and management of operated appendicular syndromes, first step to a reduction of the number of appendectomies. A global assessment of file completion could be proposed on the basis of clinical audit.