Normal values for ambulatory blood pressure and differences between casual blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure: results from a Danish population survey
Rasmussen, S.L.; Torp-Pedersen, C.; Borch-Johnsen, K.; Ibsen, H.
Journal of Hypertension 16(10): 1415-1424
1998
ISSN/ISBN: 0263-6352 PMID: 9814611 Document Number: 485997
Objective. To determine normal values for 24 h ambulatory blood pressure in a Danish population and to study the relationship to casual blood pressure. Study population. A random sample of 2656 Danish men and women participated in a population survey. The participants were selected in age groups and were aged 41-42, 51-52, 61-62 or 71-72 years during the survey. Methods. Casual blood pressure (standard mercury sphygmomanometer) and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (Takeda TM-2421) were measured successfully in 2082 subjects. All subjects under antihypertensive treatment (247) were excluded, restricting the study population to 1835 participants. Results. Casual and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure were correlated (P < 0.0001 ) in all age and sex groups. Casual systolic/diastolic blood pressures were 129.6 +- 17.8/82.6 +- 10.3 for men and 125.1 +- 18.2/79.7 +- 9.9 mmHg for women. Twenty-four-hour average blood pressures were 130.8 +- 14.2/75.3 +- 8.6 for men and 122.4 +- 14.9/69.6 +- 8.3 mmHg for women. A multivariate linear logistic regression model confirmed that a high casual blood pressure (odds ratios 11/7 for systolic/diastolic blood pressure; P= 0.001) was the major determinant of a lower ambulatory than casual blood pressure; age and sex were less important Conclusion. The relationship between casual blood pressure on the one hand and the difference in casual and 24 h ambulatory blood pressure on the other hand suggests that ambulatory blood pressure represents a regression towards the mean compared to casual blood pressure. Any definition of an upper normal level of 24 h ambulatory blood pressure that is derived from a correlation between casual and ambulatory measurements will be inaccurate, and must await long-term studies of the relationship between ambulatory blood pressure and subsequent cardiovascular events.