Top Abstract Purchase Related
Home
>
Node
>
Subnode

Biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials

Schuster, G.S.; Lefebvre, C.A.; Wataha, J.C.; White, S.N.

Journal of the California Dental Association 24(9): 17-31

1996

ISSN/ISBN: 1043-2256
PMID: 9120609
Document Number: 466816
Biocompatibility of dental materials is an important consideration for the patient, clinician, laboratory technician and manufacturer. This paper examines biocompatibility testing methods and the biocompatibility of posterior restorative materials, including amalgam, casting alloys, resin composites, dentin bonding agents, cements, porcelains and ceramics.

Document emailed within 1 workday
Secure & encrypted payments

Eichmiller, F.C.; Marjenhoff, W.A. 1996: Posterior restorative materials research Journal of the California Dental Association 24(9): 73-76
Lyons, K. 2003: Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options New Zealand Dental Journal 99(1): 10-15
McCabe, J.F.; Wilson, H.J. 1980: The use of differential scanning calorimetry for the evaluation of dental materials. I. Cements, cavity lining materials and anterior restorative materials Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 7(2): 103-110
1979: Composite restorative materials: some clinical suggestions for their use. Prepared by the Commission on Dental Materials, Instruments, Equipment and Therapeutics International Dental Journal 29(1): 54-60
Aronna, G.; De Rosa, A.; Rosso, F.; Margarucci, S.; Caruso, F. 1998: A biocompatibility study and the effects of slow-release antibiotic materials in the treatment of periodontal disease. II. the biocompatibility and behavior of polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate (pHEMA) as a slow-release material for tetracycline of metronidazole. a study of 2 cases Minerva Stomatologica 47(10): 559-564
Campbell, R.W.; Zingg, W. 1977: Biocompatibility tests for implant materials Canadian Medical Association Journal 117(2): 126
Cook, S.D.; Dalton, J.E. 1992: Biocompatibility and biofunctionality of implanted materials Alpha Omegan 85(4): 41-47
Cannas, M.; Amedeo, M.R.; Sibelli, P. 1984: In vitro biocompatibility: increase in the capacity for adhesion in fibroblasts by materials pretreated with fibronectin Bollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale 60(10): 1913-1917
McComb, D. 1998: Gallium restorative materials Journal 64(9): 645-647
Cannas, M.; Amedeo, M.R.; Denicolai, F. 1984: The fibronectin binding test: proposal of an experimental model for the evaluation of the biocompatibility of materials of orthopedic interest Bollettino della Societa Italiana di Biologia Sperimentale 60(8): 1521-1525
Porter, K.H.; Duncan, R.S. 1987: Current restorative impression materials Texas Dental Journal 104(5): 10-11
Gladys, S.; Van Meerbeek, B.; Lambrechts, P.; Vanherle, G. 2001: Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials American Journal of Dentistry 14(3): 170-176
Lewis, J. 1973: The tooth colored restorative materials Northwest Dentistry 52(6): 358-363
Seelig, A.; Doyle, J.L. 1979: Pulpal reactions to several composite restorative materials Clinical Preventive Dentistry 1(4): 6-9
Van Dijken, J.W. 2001: Durability of new restorative materials in Class IIi cavities Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(1): 65-70
Latta, M.A.; Barkmeier, W.W.; Wilwerding, T.M.; Blake, S.M. 2001: Localized wear of compomer restorative materials American Journal of Dentistry 14(4): 238-240
Gartzouni, H.; Douvitsas, G. 1988: Biologic behaviour of restorative materials to the pulp Stomatologia 45(5): 339-351
Vougiouklakis, G.; Smith, D.C. 1980: Some mechanical properties of composite restorative materials Journal 46(8): 504-512
Brown, D. 1998: The status of indirect restorative dental materials Dental Update 25(1): 23-28; 30-32, 34
Weaver, R.G.; Johnson, B.E.; Cvar, J.F.; McCune, R.J. 1972: Clinical evaluation of intermediate restorative materials Asdc Journal of Dentistry for Children 39(3): 189-193