Contraceptive use in women with heart disease
Avila, W.S.; Grinberg, M.; Melo, N.R.; Aristodemo Pinotti, J.; Pileggi, F.
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 66(4): 205-211
1996
ISSN/ISBN: 0066-782X PMID: 8935685 Document Number: 305277
The aim of this study was to analyze efficacy, tolerance, and adverse events of reversible contraceptives in women with cardiac disease. The authors studied prospectively, during a period of 24-39 (mean = 29) months, 89 women with heart disease of mean age 25.6 (16-42) years. Rheumatic heart disease was present in 73 cases (82%), congenital heart disease in 11 (11%), coronary artery disease in 2 (2%), and cardiomyopathy in 3 (3%). The patients were divided into three groups: GCO--35 patients taking combined oral contraceptives (30 mcg ethinyl estradiol and 75 mg gestodene); GIT--27 patients using injectable progestagens (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate); and GUID--27 patients with IUDs. In the GCO group were found 4 cases (11.4%) of arterial hypertension, 1 (2.8%) of a transient cerebral ischemic attack, 3 (8.5%) of spotting, 1 (2.8%) of amenorrhea, and 1 (2.8%) of pregnancy. Interruption of this method occurred in 4 cases (11.4%): 2 due to hypertension, 1 due to pregnancy, and 1 due to amenorrhea. In the GIT group there were 2 cases (7.4%) of arterial hypertension, 18 (66.6%) of amenorrhea, and 3 (11.1%) of spotting. Interruption of use occurred in 5 cases (18.5%): 2 due to amenorrhea, 2 due to weight gain, and 1 due to headache. In the GUID group there was 1 case (3.7%) of infection, 1 (3.7%) of pregnancy, and 1 (3.7%) of spontaneous expulsion of the IUD. Interruption of use took place in 3 cases (11.1%): 1 due to infection, 1 due to pregnancy, and 1 due to expulsion. The comparison between the groups demonstrated a difference in the incidence of amenorrhea (p 0.005) and method discontinuation (p 0.025). Use of reversible contraceptives in women with heart disease was associated with an acceptable cardiovascular risk. Efficacy and side effects of the methods were comparable in the groups; however, intolerance was observed more in the GIT group. (author's modified)