Immediate sequelae and rationale of menstrual regulation
Agarwal, A.; Kinra, G.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 29(2): 285-288
1979
ISSN/ISBN: 0971-9202 PMID: 12335894 Document Number: 441985
Menstrual regulation as a contraceptive method, as well as a form of early pregnancy termination, was studied in 200 patients presenting at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital for pregnancy termination. Findings supported the contention that menstrual regulation is a simple, safe, and effective procedure. Recommendations were made to incorporate the procedure into family planning services. Women were deemed eligible for the menstrual regulation study if no more than 45 days had elapsed since their last menstrual cycle and if their medical history did not contraindicate the use of the procedure. The women were given a pregnancy test prior to aspiration. The menstrual regulation procedure was performed with an electric vaccum aspirator and the patients received no anesthetic. Following the procedure the aspirate was histologically examined for pregnancy determination. Four weeks later the patients were given a pelvic examination and a urine pregnancy test. Histological examination of the aspirate confirmed pregnancy in 80.5% of the patients. When the findings were compared to the preoperative pregnancy test results, 2.5% of the pregnancy tests were false positives and 4% were false negatives. No severe complications occurred at the time of the procedure an only 2% of the patients required additional curettage. In the 4 week follow-up examination, 10% of the patients reported minor symptoms, 3% reported minor infections, and all pregnancy tests were negative. Following the procedure, 20% of the patients accepted IUDs, 15% accepted horomonal contraceptives, and the remaining 65% opted for conventional methods. Tables show 1) age distribution of patients; 2) distribution of patients by gestation and amount of aspirate; 3) accuracy of pregnancy test compared to histological findings; 4) frequency of histological findings; 5) reported follow-up symptoms for those patients who accepted IUDs and those who did not accept IUDs immediately after menstrual regulation.