Comparative evaluation of light-trap catches, electric motor mosquito catches and human biting catches of Anopheles in the Three Gorges Reservoir

Duo-quan, W.; Lin-hua, T.; Zhen-cheng, G.; Xiang, Z.; Man-ni, Y.; Wei-kang, J.

PLOS one 7(1): E28988

2012


ISSN/ISBN: 1932-6203
PMID: 22235256
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028988
Document Number: 408757
The mosquito sampling efficiency of light-trap catches and electric motor mosquito catches were compared with that of human biting catches in the Three Gorges Reservoir. There was consistency in the sampling efficiency between light-trap catches and human biting catches for Anopheles sinensis (r = 0.82, P<0.01) and light-trap catches were 1.52 (1.35-1.71) times that of human biting catches regardless of mosquito density (r = 0.33, P>0.01), while the correlation between electric motor mosquito catches and human biting catches was found to be not statistically significant (r = 0.43, P>0.01) and its sampling efficiency was below that of human biting catches. It is concluded that light-traps can be used as an alternative to human biting catches of Anopheles sinensis in the study area and is a promising tool for sampling malaria vector populations.

Document emailed within 0-6 h
Secure & encrypted payments