Reassessment of the metabolic effects of oral contraceptives
Franklin, M.
Journal of Nurse-Midwifery 35(6): 358-364
1990
ISSN/ISBN: 0091-2182 PMID: 2286849 DOI: 10.1016/s0091-2182(05)80018-7Document Number: 375224
Progestins counteract the positive effect of the estrogen component in oral contraceptives (OCs) on cholesterol levels thus increasing the risk of atherosclerosis. Low androgenic potency progestins do not have a negative effect, however. Other research indicates that the lower the estrogen dose in OCs the lower the risk of deep vein and superficial thrombosis. OC users, especially low dose OC users, with no other risk factors (e.g. smoking and hypertension) are not at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Some research demonstrates elevated risk of stroke in OC users, however. Elevated cholesterol, obesity, diabetes and other factors further increases the risk of stroke. Combined OCs protect against endometrial and ovarian cancer and this effect increases with use and continues after use. Moreover OC users are not at increased risk of pituitary adenoma. Results of some studies shows an increased risk of cervical cancer, but other only demonstrates a slight increase. So far research does not indicate the following to increase breast cancer risk among OC users: early age at 1st OC use, formulation, family history, and history of benign breast disease. There is an increased risk for liver tumors in OC users, nevertheless it is rare. OCs do not raise the risk of diabetes or gallbladder disease. High dose formulations increases the risk of high blood pressure, but not so with low dose formulations. OC use does not impair, fertility, but delayed conception often occurs. Most research demonstrates no increase in pelvic inflammatory disease in OC users. OCs do not cause congenital malformations. Combined OC use is contraindicated for breast feeding mothers, but progestin only OCs can be used with no advance effects. Results of 1 study demonstrates an increase in HIV infection in OC users, but another study has opposite results. The article concludes with recommended clinical management practices.