Female employment and fertility in developing countries: what does the World Fertility Survey tell us?
Poirier, J.; Piche, V.; Neill, G.
Cahiers Quebecois de Demographie 18(1): 159-184
1989
ISSN/ISBN: 0380-1721 PMID: 12316009 Document Number: 367855
This work reviews the general objectives of the World Fertility Survey (WFS), the theoretical basis and objectives of the questions on female employment and fertility, and their results and interpretations in an effort to assess the usefulness of the WFS in understanding the links between female employment and fertility in developing countries. 42 developing countries participated in the WFS from 1974-82. The 14 questions on female employment were the only ones in the basic questionnaire that had an explicit theoretical foundation. The questions reflected 2 interrelated approaches to differential fertility behavior prevalent in social demography, those of role incompatibility and of sex role orientation. The WFS definition of work as including all productive activity except household occupations was accepted by only 26 of the 42 developing countries. The results of major studies comparing WFS results from at least 10 countries using multivariate analytical techniques have been confusing and contradictory in the area of female employment and fertility. The studies have used varying dependent and independent variables and have defined work status in different ways in attempts to distinguish between paid and unpaid work, work at home or outside the home, and work at different stages of the life cycle. Some analysts have concluded on the basis of WFS data that there is no systematic relationship between female employment and fertility in developing countries and that a detailed focus on questions about employment represents a misuse of resources. It appears more likely that the concepts chosen and their application were responsible for the lack of clear results. The exclusion of "house occupations" in the definition of work may have serious consequences in the context of developing countries, where such work may be essential to the survival of most households. Interviewers had responsibility for determining the principal occupation of women with more than 1 and juding whether or not the occupation was carried out primarily in the home. Differences in the quality of employment data between countries may to a large extent reflect interviewer judgment. The disappointing WFS findings raise questions concerning other possible explanations for the lack of a systematic link between employment and fertility, and concerning the usefulness of WFS data for study of such associations. The results of the WFS analysis appear to invalidate the implicit theoretical focus on role incompatibility and sex role orientation more than the employment-fertility link as a whole. Some case studies in specific countries using WFS data have provided evidence of the additional influence of other factors on the employment-fertility link. It is recommended therefore that a more global institutional approach taking into account the specific context of each society be employed in analyzing the female employment-fertility link. WFS data would be useful in such an approach but because of their fragmentary nature they should be supplemented with data from other sources.