The efficacy and safety of nalbuphine (NUBAIN) in balanced anesthesia. a double blind comparison with fentanyl in gynecological and urological surgery
Crul, J.F.; Smets, M.J.; van Egmond, J.
Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica 41(3): 261-267
1990
ISSN/ISBN: 0001-5164 PMID: 2260432 Document Number: 358503
In a prospective double blind study the efficacy and safety of nalbuphine as an analgesic in balanced anesthesia has been compared to fentanyl. In 63 patients, ASA class I-III, major gynecological or urological surgical procedures were performed under balanced anesthesia. Analgesia could be satisfactory maintained in all cases, but in cases of nalbuphine more hypnotics were necessary to keep the patients unconscious. The ratio of fentanyl and nalbuphine consumption was 1:200 (by weight). The nalbuphine cases can be distinguished by: more stable but higher arterial pressures and absence of arrythmia; lower incidence of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative period; less respiratory depression at the end of anesthesia, not needing antagonists, as compared to 11 patients needing antagonization in the fentanyl group; and a larger incidence of minor local allergic reactions at the injection site. Awareness was not observed in any patient of either group. Although nalbuphine has a weaker analgesic and hypnotic effect, it is perfectly possible to provide balanced anesthesia in combination with a hypnotic and a muscle relaxant. Advantages are the absence of respiratory depression as well as nausea and vomiting in the postoperative period.