Gabexate mesilate in the treatment of acute pancreatitis

Pederzoli, P.; Bassi, C.; Falconi, M.; De Santis, L.; Uomo, G.; Rabitti, P.G.; Talamini, G.; Cavallini, G.

Annali Italiani di Chirurgia 66(2): 191-195

1995


ISSN/ISBN: 0003-469X
PMID: 7545361
Document Number: 3461
Despite controversial experimental and clinical findings, the use of Aprotinin (A) in the treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP) is still widespread in our country. Compared to A, Gabexate Mesilate (FOY) should have the following advantages: lack of antigenicity. low molecular weight with better cellular penetrance, wide inhibitory spectrum (against phospholipase A2 too) and good tolerability. In order to verify the efficacy of FOY versus, we decided to carry out a prospective multicenter (34 centers) randomized double blind trial in moderate-severe AP with FOY 3g/day versus A 1.500.000 U.I.K/day infused for 7 days with central venous line. Based on standard clinical, biochemical and radiological data, 199 patients suffering from AP were enrolled to the study from January 1989 to December 1990. The main admission criteria were: onset of the disease from no more than 72 hours, at least 2 Ranson positive criteria and C.T evidence of acute pancreatic damage. Seventeen no protocol patients were excluded. The Etiology in the 182 analyzed patients (106 male, 76 female; mean age 57.6 years, range 21-91) were: biliary 102 (56%), alcohol 47 (25.8%), post-operative 13 (7.1%), unknown causes 13 (7.1%) and others 7 (3.8%). Median Ranson's Score was 3. CT examination showed 66 AP with edema, while 116 cases (63.7%) were recognized as severe forms with pancreatic necrotic involvement of 30% of the gland in 71 (61.2%), 50% in 31 (26.7%), and more than 50% in 14 (12.1%). Out of 182 patients, 91 were treated with A and 91 with FOY. The two groups were comparable regarding the main prognostic factors. At the end of treatment, patients were followed up for eight days in order to compare a hospital outcome as regards the systemic complications, pseudocysts development, early sepsis, need of surgery and mortality rate. The long term follow-up is still running (3-6 months). In the edematous group, neither local nor systemic complications were observed and all patients survived while 7 patients out of the 116 necrotic cases died within 15 days (6%). The overall incidence of systemic complications (pulmonary, renal and cardiovascular failures) in the remaining necrotic AP group was 17 out of 116 (14.7%); 12/51 with A (23.5%) versus 5/65 with FOY (7.7%, chi square test p<0.05). The need for early surgery was 13/51 (25.5%) in A group, 7/65 (10.8%) in FOY group (chi square test p<0.05). No statistical difference (A versus FOY) was found regarding pseudocysts development (17.6% versus 7.7%), early sepsis (5.9% versus 6.1%) and mortality rate (7.8% versus 4.6%). These data suggest that in the early phases of AP FOY treatment is more effective than A in reducing the incidence of complications secondary to pancreatitis toxemia.

Document emailed within 1 workday
Secure & encrypted payments

Gabexate mesilate in the treatment of acute pancreatitis