Effect of early postoperative volume loading on left ventricular systolic function (including left ventricular ejection fraction determined by myocardial marker) after myocardial revascularization
Miller, D.C.; Daughters, G.T.; Derby, G.C.; Mitchell, R.S.; Ingels, N.B.; Stinson, E.B.; Alderman, E.L.
Circulation 72(3 Pt 2): Ii207-Ii215
1985
ISSN/ISBN: 0009-7322 PMID: 3896554 Document Number: 256317
The effects of early volume loading in terms of isovolumetric-phase and ejection-phase indexes of left ventricular systolic function were studied in 12 patients 5 hr after myocardial revascularization, with myocardial markers used to measure left ventricular volume directly and with simultaneous transmural left ventricular pressure measurements by micromanometers. Volume loading (increasing transmural left ventricular end-diastolic pressure from 11 +/- 4 to 15 +/- 5 mm Hg) induced a significant 14% increase in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), which was associated (as expected) with significant (p less than .005) augmentation of stroke work (+26%), left ventricular pressure-volume loop area (+35%), and stroke volume index (+22%) and with increments in left ventricular dP/dt and mean velocity of circumferential fiber shortening despite a simultaneous increase in left ventricular afterload. In contrast to previous radionuclide studies, however, left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly (+9%) and the left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume ratio did not fall. The relative change in ejection fraction was directly proportional to the increment in LVEDVI (r = .54, p = .03) and inversely related to the change in left ventricular end-systolic volume index (r = -.71, p = .0005). Patients who demonstrated a small or no increase in ejection fraction generally had a larger simultaneous increase in afterload, but one patient exhibited exhaustion of preload reserve. Ejection fraction, as an ejection-phase index of left ventricular performance, is highly dependent on afterload; therefore, interpretation of postoperative changes in ejection fraction must be undertaken only with strict caution.