Low-osmolality contrast agents in angiocardiography
Human, D.G.; de Moor, M.M.; Cremin, B.J.
South African Medical Journal 67(24): 959-960
1985
ISSN/ISBN: 0256-9574 PMID: 4002082 Document Number: 242071
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Ruíz Ros, J.A.; Gimeno Gascón, J.V.; Cebolla Rosell, R.; Palacios Motilla, V.; Algarra Vidal, F.J. 1978: Hemodynamic effects of the contrast media used for angiocardiography. its value as an overload test of the left ventricle Revista Clinica Espanola 148(2): 131-136Tanaka, H.; Senju, M.; Ikeuchi, H.; Nakatani, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Kishimoto, T.; Maekawa, M. 1988: Intravenous urography with a nonionic low osmolality contrast medium (iopamidol) in elderly patients Hinyokika Kiyo. Acta Urologica Japonica 34(12): 2219-2223
Haude, M.; Jehle, J.; Löss, B.; Pölitz, B.; Schmiel, F.K.; Spiller, P. 1985: Evaluation of myocardial perfusion based on digital subtraction angiocardiography measured contrast medium flow times Zeitschrift für Kardiologie 74(12): 692-699
Hoshino, A.; Enomoto, S.; Kawahito, H.; Kurata, H.; Nakahara, Y.; Nakamura, T. 2007: Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy using cardiac catheterization combined with hydration, oral N-acetylcysteine, sodium bicarbonate and iso-osmolar contrast agents Journal of Cardiology 50(2): 119-126
Lauber, A.; Deetjen, W.; Jehle, J.; Pölitz, B.; Schmiel, F.K.; Spiller, P. 1984: Digital subtraction angiocardiography: accuracy of measuring left ventricular wall thickness and wall volume during intravenous contrast media injection Zeitschrift für Kardiologie 73(4): 257-263
Tanaka, K.; Nishino, M.; Tanouchi, J. 1998: Clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) and evaluation of suitable contrast agents for ICUS Nihon Rinsho. Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine 56(4): 942-946
Yasu, T.; Schmid-Schönbein, G.W. 2000: Ultrasound contrast agents for echocardiography Drugs of Today 36(10): 725-731
Frank, J.H.; Cooper, G.W.; Black, W.C.; Phillips, L.H. 1987: Iodinated contrast agents in myasthenia gravis Neurology 37(8): 1400-1402
Hunter, A.N.; Meinhold, H.; Stockigt, J.R. 1982: Alterations in thyroid function after cholecystographic contrast agents Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 12(2): 192-195
Bhat, K.N.; Arroyave, C.M.; Crown, R. 1976: Reaction to radiographic contrast agents: new developments in etiology Annals of Allergy 37(3): 169-173
Deklunder, G.; Gautier, C.; Boivin, V. 2003: Value of sonographic contrast agents in the evaluation of the cerebral arteries Journal de Radiologie 84(12 Part 2): 2063-2068
Moussa, L.M.; Nabhane, L.; Smayra, T.; Zebouni, S.H.; Mohanna, A.; Abi Khalil, S.; Aoun, N. 2012: Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast agents used in radiology: a review Le Journal Medical Libanais. Lebanese Medical Journal 60(3): 159-163
Holtz, E.; Golman, K. 1987: Experimental urography with new non-ionic dimeric and monomeric contrast agents Acta Radiologica. Supplementum 370: 49-55
Ratcliffe, J. 1989: The effects of water soluble contrast agents on the respiratory tract Australasian Radiology 33(4): 409
Sergeev, P.V.; Usenko, A.N.; Firsov, N.N.; Shimanovskiĭ, N.L. 1989: Effect of x-ray contrast agents on the deformation properties of human erythrocytes Biulleten' Eksperimental'noi Biologii i Meditsiny 107(2): 194-196
Temnov, A.A.; Shimanovskiĭ, N.L. 1999: The effect of contrast agents on latex phagocytosis by mouse neutrophils Eksperimental'naia i Klinicheskaia Farmakologiia 62(1): 60-61
Klimanova, E.V.; Makarov, V.A.; Petrukhina, G.N.; Bolotova, E.N.; Shimanovskiĭ, N.L. 2009: Effect of x-ray contrast agents on the thromboresistant properties of vascular walls Eksperimental'naia i Klinicheskaia Farmakologiia 72(2): 41-43
Kozlov, V.A.; Eĭdlin, Z.I. 1985: Choice of the degree of dilution of contrast agents for studying the bile ducts Vestnik Rentgenologii i Radiologii 2: 77-78
Bettman, M.A. 1996: Intravascular contrast agents. Current problems and future solutions-- a review Acta Radiologica. Supplementum 400: 3-7
Doucet, D.; Idée, J.M.; Donadieu, A.M.; Bonnemain, B. 1989: Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic effects of low osmolar contrast agents during coronary angiography in the dog and the rabbit Annales de Radiologie 32(1): 43-48