British panel grapples with IVF issue, proposes legislation, surrogacy ban
Medical World News 25(15): 28
1984
ISSN/ISBN: 0025-763X PMID: 11645522 Document Number: 230810
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Johnson, L.; Blyth, E.; Hammarberg, K. 2014: Barriers for domestic surrogacy and challenges of transnational surrogacy in the context of Australians undertaking surrogacy in India Journal of Law and Medicine 22(1): 136-154Ewing, C.; Rowland, R. 1990: Draft report on surrogacy issued by the Australian National Bioethics Consultative Committee -- the debate on surrogacy in Australia continues Response to the draft report of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee (NBCC), Surrogacy Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering: Journal of International Feminist Analysis 3(2): 143-157
Andres, A.R. 2004: Determinants of self-reported mental health using the British household panel survey Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics 7(3): 99-106
Sandoe, J.A.T.; Barlow, G.; Chambers, J.B.; Gammage, M.; Guleri, A.; Howard, P.; Olson, E.; Perry, J.D.; Prendergast, B.D.; Spry, M.J.; Steeds, R.P.; Tayebjee, M.H.; Watkin, R. 2015: Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of implantable cardiac electronic device infection. Report of a joint Working Party project on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC, host organization), British Heart Rhythm Society (BHRS), British Cardiovascular Society (BCS), British Heart Valve Society (BHVS) and British Society for Echocardiography (BSE) Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 70(2): 325-359
Twigg, L. 1999: Choosing a national survey to investigate smoking behaviour: making comparisons between the General Household Survey, the British Household Panel Survey and the Health Survey for England Journal of Public Health Medicine 21(1): 14-21
Twigg, L. 1999: Choosing a national survey to investigate smoking behaviour: making comparisons between the General Household Survey, the British Household Panel Survey and the Health Survey for England Journal of Public Health Medicine 21(1): 14-21
Twigg, L. 1999: Choosing a national survey to investigate smoking behaviour: making comparisons between the General Household Survey, the British Household Panel Survey and the Health Survey for England Journal of Public Health Medicine 21(1): 14-21
Twigg, L. 1999: Choosing a national survey to investigate smoking behaviour: making comparisons between the General Household Survey, the British Household Panel Survey and the Health Survey for England Journal of Public Health Medicine 21(1): 14-21
Twigg, L. 1999: Choosing a national survey to investigate smoking behaviour: making comparisons between the General Household Survey, the British Household Panel Survey and the Health Survey for England Journal of Public Health Medicine 21(1): 14-21
Galloro, V. 2006: LifePoint grapples with acquisition. Woes at Province contribute to earnings shortfall Modern Healthcare 36(3): 10-11
Faure, Y.A.; C N, E. Y. A. 1979: Sénégal: législation in Annuaire de législation française et étrangère. Année 1977 Communications (Paris, 1962): 370-371
Faure, Y.A.; C N, E. Y. A. 1979: Sénégal: législation in Annuaire de législation française et étrangère. Année 1977 Communications (Paris, 1962): 370-371
Cotton, K. 2000: Surrogacy should pay Bmj 320(7239): 928-929
Nau, J.-Y. 2009: Against surrogacy Revue Medicale Suisse 5(195): 651
Stein, S.L. 2017: The Changing Face of Surgery Today: It is Not a Women's Issue, It's a Work Force Issue Annals of Surgery 266(2): 218-219
Dawson, G. 2001: African Americans and the abortion issue: big issue, little discussion Journal of the National Medical Association 93(10): 412-418
Bromham, D.R. 1992: Surrogacy: the evolution of opinion British Journal of Hospital Medicine 47(10): 767-772
Nolan, M. 1998: Surrogacy: a commercial proposition? Practising Midwife 1(4): 14-17
Brahams, D.; Cotton, K. 1985: The future of surrogacy in Great Britain Medico-Legal Journal 53(1): 3-5
Sifris, R.; Ludlow, K.; Sifris, A. 2015: Commercial Surrogacy: what Role for Law in Australia? Journal of Law and Medicine 23(2): 275-296