Draft report on surrogacy issued by the Australian National Bioethics Consultative Committee -- the debate on surrogacy in Australia continues Response to the draft report of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee (NBCC) , Surrogacy
Ewing, C.; Rowland, R.
Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering Journal of International Feminist Analysis 3(2): 143-157
1990
ISSN/ISBN: 0958-6415 PMID: 11650919 Document Number: 214624
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Johnson, L.; Blyth, E.; Hammarberg, K. 2014: Barriers for domestic surrogacy and challenges of transnational surrogacy in the context of Australians undertaking surrogacy in India Journal of Law and Medicine 22(1): 136-154Sifris, R.; Ludlow, K.; Sifris, A. 2015: Commercial Surrogacy: what Role for Law in Australia? Journal of Law and Medicine 23(2): 275-296
Stuhmcke, A. 2011: The criminal act of commercial surrogacy in Australia: a call for review Journal of Law and Medicine 18(3): 601-613
Ema, M.; Fukui, Y.; Aoyama, H.; Fujiwara, M.; Fuji, J.; Inouye, M.; Iwase, T.; Kihara, T.; Oi, A.; Otani, H.; Shinomiya, M.; Sugioka, K.; Yamano, T.; Yamashita, K.H.; Tanimura, T. 2007: Comments from the Developmental Neurotoxicology Committee of the Japanese Teratology Society on the OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Proposal for a New Guideline 426, Developmental Neurotoxicity Study, Draft Document (October 2006 version), and on the Draft Document of the Retrospective Performance Assessment of the Draft Test Guideline 426 on Developmental Neurotoxicity Congenital anomalies 47(2): 74-76
Meslin, E.M. 1999: The National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) report Biological Psychiatry 46(8): 1011-1012
Nau, J.-Y. 2009: Against surrogacy Revue Medicale Suisse 5(195): 651
Cotton, K. 2000: Surrogacy should pay Bmj 320(7239): 928-929
Cembrani, F. 2016: Deep continuous palliative sedation in the Opinion adopted by the Italian National Bioethics Committee (Deep palliative sedation) Giornale Italiano di Nefrologia: Organo Ufficiale Della Societa Italiana di Nefrologia 33(6)
Nolan, M. 1998: Surrogacy: a commercial proposition? Practising Midwife 1(4): 14-17
Bromham, D.R. 1992: Surrogacy: the evolution of opinion British Journal of Hospital Medicine 47(10): 767-772
Brahams, D.; Cotton, K. 1985: The future of surrogacy in Great Britain Medico-Legal Journal 53(1): 3-5
Friedrich, M.J. 2001: NCLAC report outlines policy recommendations for updating the National Cancer Act. National Cancer Legislation Advisory Committee Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93(21): 1592-1594
Clementina, P. 2011: Gestational surrogacy: could be a way to be a way to reproduction? Pros and cons Georgian Medical News 195: 11-14
Rothman, B.K. 1992: Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: a feminist perspective Creighton Law Review 25(5): 1599-1607
1984: British panel grapples with IVF issue, proposes legislation, surrogacy ban Medical World News 25(15): 28
Bayó i Llibre, J.; Coll de Tuero, G.; Dalfó i Baqué, A.; de la Figuera von Wichmann, M.; Salleras i Marco, N.; Vinyoles i Bargalló, E. 2003: Contributions of the seventh report of the Joint National Committee. Six years on Atencion Primaria 32(8): 471-474
Rabadán, A.T.; Tripodoro, V.A. 2017: When to consult the institutional bioethics committee? The deliberative method for resolving possible dilemmas Medicina 77(6): 486-490
Sherman, S.R. 1984: Ethical implications of clinical judgment (the role of the hospital bioethics committee) Connecticut Medicine 48(2): 131-132
Fedson, D.S. 1994: Adult immunization. Summary of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee Report JAMA 272(14): 1133-1137
Printz, C. 2012: Draft screening guidelines spark debate: possible drawbacks and long-term effects of new draft guidelines for prostate cancer screening Cancer 118(9): 2335-2336