Day and night contact lenses. a comparative study
Zibrandtsen, P.C.; Jensen, H.; Lauersen, H.; Corydon, L.
Ugeskrift for Laeger 146(40): 3026-3029
1984
ISSN/ISBN: 0041-5782 PMID: 6515936 Document Number: 225904
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Alemany, A.L.; Refojo, M.F. 2000: Comparative study of the hydration of hydrophilic contact lenses by refractive index and gravimetry Clao Journal: Official Publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists Inc 26(4): 200-203Krejcí, L.; Brettschneider, I.; Praus, R. 1971: Comparative study of the uptake and release of fluorescein by various types of therapeutic hydrophilic gel contact lenses Ceskoslovenska Oftalmologie 27(5): 285-291
Poggio, E.C.; Abelson, M.B. 1993: Complications and symptoms with disposable daily wear contact lenses and conventional soft daily wear contact lenses Clao Journal: Official Publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists Inc 19(2): 95-102
Jain, M.R. 1976: Flexible contact lenses and our experience with 'Sauflon 70' lenses in aphakia Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 23(4): 5-13
Wick, B. 1978: Nearpoint symptoms associated with change from spectacle lenses to contact lenses Journal of the American Optometric Association 49(11): 1295-1297
Kastl, P.R.; Donzis, P.B.; Cole, H.P.; Rice, J.; Baldone, J.A. 1987: A 20-year retrospective study of the use of contact lenses in keratoconus Clao Journal: Official Publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists Inc 13(2): 102-104
Kamiya, C. 1982: A study of corneal endothelial response to contact lenses Contact and Intraocular Lens Medical Journal 8(2): 92-95
Brown, B.G. 1981: Management of refractive errors in myopic athletes. A comparison of the Bausch and Lomb Soflens (Polymacon) contact lenses with glasses, hard lenses, and no correction Contact and Intraocular Lens Medical Journal 7(2): 123-143
Srur, M.; Dattas, D. 1997: The use of disposable contact lenses as therapeutic lenses Clao Journal: Official Publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists Inc 23(1): 40-42
2005: The Japan Contact Lens Society Guidelines for Contact Lens. Adaptation and selection of a contact lenses Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 109(10): 648-649
Josephson, J.E.; Caffery, B.E. 1987: Monovision vs. aspheric bifocal contact lenses: a crossover study Journal of the American Optometric Association 58(8): 652-654
Thakur, D.V.; Gaikwad, U.N. 2014: Microbial contamination of soft contact lenses and accessories in asymptomatic contact lens users Indian Journal of Medical Research 140(2): 307-309
2005: The Japan Contact Lens Society Guidelines for Contact Lens. Prescription of a contact lenses Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 109(10): 650-653
Morgan, B.W.; Henry, V.A.; Bennett, E.S.; Caroline, P.J. 1992: The effect of modification procedures on rigid gas permeable contact lenses: the UM-St. Louis Study Journal of the American Optometric Association 63(3): 201-214
Stahler, D.; Teubel, H.; Karsten, H. 1989: Effect of welding arcs on the eyes of patients with contact lenses (literature study) Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete 35(1): 8-10
Movin, M.; Jensen, O.L. 1988: Eye infections endangering the sight. A retrospective study from a 6-year period with special attention to the use of contact lenses Ugeskrift for Laeger 150(42): 2522-2525
Ehrich, W. 1984: Contact lenses and contact lens solutions Medizinische Monatsschrift für Pharmazeuten 7(1): 2-11
Lleó Pérez, A.; Alonso Muñoz, L.; Sanchís Gimeno, J.A.; Marcos Jorge, M.A.; Rahhal, M.S. 2003: Comparative clinical study of visual results between two different types of bifocal intraocular lenses Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia 78(12): 665-673
Delafosse, J.Y.; Léger, D.; Quera-Salva, M.A.; Samson, O.; Adrien, J. 2000: Comparative study of actigraphy and ambulatory polysomnography in the assessment of adaptation to night shift work in nurses Revue Neurologique (Paris) 156(6-7): 641-645
Díaz-Llopis, M.; Montero, J.; Amselem, L.; Udaondo, P.; García-Delpech, S. 2008: Posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses: a comparative study between ICL and PRL models. Choosing/selection criteria Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia 83(4): 215-217