Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?

Franchini, M.; Cianferoni, L.; Lippi, G.; Calonaci, F.; Calzolari, S.; Mazzini, M.; Florio, P.

Fertility and Sterility 91(4 Suppl): 1499-1502

2009


ISSN/ISBN: 1556-5653
PMID: 18930457
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.027
Document Number: 205369
By using the activity-based cost/management (ABC/M) system we computed and compared costs needed for laparoscopic tubal sterilization (LTS) and Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion (EHTO). We found that total health costs related to consultation and presurgery did not differ between LTS and EHTO; EHTO has low recovery unit costs but is more costly for the operating theater, mainly due to Essure microinserts.

Document emailed within 0-6 h
Secure & encrypted payments

Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?