Intrauterine contraception as an alternative to interval tubal sterilization
Grimes, D.A.; Mishell, D.R.
Contraception 77(1): 6-9
2007
ISSN/ISBN: 0010-7824 PMID: 18082660 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.012Document Number: 202514
A phosphate-selective molecularly imprinted polymer was prepared using 1-allyl-2-thiourea as a functional monomer, and the binding ability and selectivity of the polymer were evaluated. The imprinted polymer showed high binding ability to and selectivity for phosphate in aqueous media. The recoverability of phosphate from the imprinted polymer was also examined, and nearly 70% of highly concentrated phosphate could be recovered.
Document emailed within 0-6 h
Related Documents
Costello, C.; Hillis, S.D.; Marchbanks, P.A.; Jamieson, D.J.; Peterson, H.B. 2002: The effect of interval tubal sterilization on sexual interest and pleasure Obstetrics and Gynecology 100(3): 511-517Chi, I.C.; Thapa, S. 1994: Mechanical devices for interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization in previous IUD users Advances in Contraception: the Official Journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception 10(3): 223-234
Chi, I.C.; Thapa, S. 1994: Mechanical devices for interval laparoscopic tubal sterilization in previous IUD users Advances in Contraception: the Official Journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception 10(3): 223-234
Chi, I.C. 1994: Use of multiple clips for tubal occlusion in interval laparoscopic sterilization: Circumstances and consequences Contraception 50(5): 409-416
Van Kets, H.; Van der Pas, H.; Thiery, M.; Wildemeersch, D.; Vrijens, M.; Van Trappen, Y.; Temmerman, M.; DePypere, H.; Delbarge, W.; Dhont, M.; Defoort, P.; Schacht, E.H.; Bàtàr, I.; Barri, P.; Martinez, F.; Iglesias Cortit, L.H.; Creatsas, G.; Shangchun, W.; Xiaoming, C.; Zuan-chong, F.; Yu-ming, W.; Andrade, A.; Reinprayoon, D.; Pizarro, E. 1997: The GyneFix implant systems for interval, postabortal and postpartum contraception: a significant advance in long-term reversible contraception. International Study Group on Intrauterine Drug Delivery European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care: the Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception 2(1): 1-13
Agostini, A.; Crochet, P.; Petrakian, M.; Estrade, J.P.; Cravello, L.; Gamerre, M. 2008: Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization (essure) in women with an intrauterine device Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 15(3): 277-279
Fernandez, H.; Panel, P.; Blein, C.; Lamarsalle, L. 2012: Efficacy of Tubal Sterilization: Reported Pregnancies after Tubal Ligation and Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization French Enquiry 2006-2010 Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 19(6): S19-S20
Yan, C.; Chuck, A. 2014: Cost Effectiveness of Hysteroscopic Tubal Sterilization (Hts) Compared to Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization (Lts) for Permanent Birth Control Value in Health 17(3): A160-A161
Yan, C.; Chuck, A. 2014: Cost Effectiveness of Hysteroscopic Tubal Sterilization (Hts) Compared to Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization (Lts) for Permanent Birth Control Value in Health 17(3): A160-A161
2004: Contraception par progestatif faiblement dosé en continu : Une alternative à la contraception estroprogestative, au prix d'irrégularités du cycle - Contraception by low-progestogen continuously : An alternative to oestroprogestative contraception, but with irregular periods la Revue Prescrire 24(248): 196-206
Kohoutek, M.; Nozicka, Z. 1978: Tubal actinomycosis as a complication of intrauterine contraception Zentralblatt für Gynakologie 100(3): 179-182
Seiler, J.S. 1986: Laparoscopic tubal sterilization combined with removal of an intrauterine contraceptive device. A report of 49 cases Journal of Reproductive Medicine 31(5): 339-342
Goodman, S.; Hendlish, S.K.; Benedict, C.; Reeves, M.F.; Pera-Floyd, M.; Foster-Rosales, A. 2008: Increasing intrauterine contraception use by reducing barriers to post-abortal and interval insertion Contraception 78(2): 136-142
Dorjgochoo, T.; Shu, X.-O.; Li, H.-L.; Qian, H.-Z.; Yang, G.; Cai, H.; Gao, Y.-T.; Zheng, W. 2009: Use of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices and tubal sterilization and cancer risk in a large prospective study, from 1996 to 2006 International Journal of Cancer 124(10): 2442-2449
De Oliveira, I.T.; Dias, J.é G.; Padmadas, S.S. 2014: Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact Plos one 9(1): E86654
De Oliveira, I.T.; Dias, J.é G.; Padmadas, S.S. 2014: Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact Plos one 9(1): E86654
Jones, J.K.; Tave, A.; Pezzullo, J.C.; Kardia, S.; Lippes, J. 2017: Long-term risk of reproductive cancer among Vietnamese women using the quinacrine hydrochloride pellet system vs. intrauterine devices or tubal ligation for contraception European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care: the Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception 22(2): 123-130
Dubuisson, J-Bernard; Chapron, C; Swolin, K 1996: A Simplified Procedure for Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization Reversal: The One Tubal Stitch Technique Journal of Gynecologic Surgery 12(3): 177-181
Mukherjee, S.K. 1977: Recurrence of tubal stump pregnancy following female sexual tubal sterilization American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 129(3): 339-341
Spalding, H.; Perälä, J.; Martikainen, H.; Tekay, A.; Jouppila, P. 1998: Assessing tubal patency with transvaginal salpingosonography after the reversal of tubal ligation for female sterilization Human Reproduction 13(1o): 2819-2822