Comparison between biparietal diameter of the head as determined by ultrasound and fetal body weight
Gubza, S.; Bruchác, D.
Bratislavske Lekarske Listy 67(2): 217-220
1977
ISSN/ISBN: 0006-9248 PMID: 858077 Document Number: 123249
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Gutknecht, J.H. 1998: Biparietal diameter, fetal maturity, and body weight in rural Tanzanian newborns Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 44(2): 66-69Ylöstalo, P.; Järvinen, P.A. 1974: Estimate of fetal weight from the ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter and the body dimensions in normal pregnancies and pre-eclampsia Annales Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae Fenniae 63(1): 24-27
Ilieva, K. 1981: Determination of fetal weight and growth by ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 20(3): 214-217
Destro, F.; Bulzomí, R. 1975: Sonagraphic assessment of biparietal diameter and fetal weight in a sample of the population from the region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia Minerva Ginecologica 27(12): 988-991
Göttlicher, S.; Madjarić, J.; Krone, H.A. 1977: The biparietal fetal diameter during twin and normal pregnancy. An ultrasonographic comparison Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 37(9): 762-767
Hayashi, R.H.; Berry, J.L.; Castillo, M.S. 1981: Use of ultrasound biparietal diameter in timing of repeat cesarean section Obstetrics and Gynecology 57(3): 325-329
Siwadune, T.; Sunsaneevithayakul, P.; Titapant, V.; Boriboonhirunsarn, D.; Kanokpongsakdi, S. 2000: Charts of Thai fetal biometries: 2. Biparietal diameter Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 83(3): 292-298
Newton, E.R.; Cetrulo, C.L.; Kosa, D.J. 1983: Biparietal diameter as a predictor of fetal lung maturity Journal of Reproductive Medicine 28(7): 480-484
Zou, L.; Gabert, H.A.; McGanity, W.J. 1985: Fetal lung maturity prediction by placental grade and biparietal diameter Chinese Medical Journal 98(8): 561-564
Kazzi, G.M.; Gross, T.L.; Sokol, R.J. 1983: Fetal biparietal diameter an placental grade: predictors of intrauterine growth retardation Obstetrics and Gynecology 62(6): 755-759
Kyank, H.; Kruse, H.J.; Adomssent, S.; Herre, H.D.; Plesse, R.; Löscher, H. 1975: Results of standard-value determinations in newborn infants in the German Democratic Republic. II. Head circumference, biparietal and fronto-occipital diameter Zentralblatt für Gynakologie 97(15): 897-904
Titapant, V.; Chawanpaiboon, S.; Mingmitpatanakul, K. 2001: A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 84(9): 1251-1257
Demidov, V.N. 1979: Clinical value of ultrasonic determination of biparietal measurement of fetal head Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 8: 50-52
Van de Bor, M.; Ruys, J.H. 1983: Normal values of the diameter of the lateral ventricles in newborn infants determined with ultrasound Tijdschrift Voor Kindergeneeskunde 51(2): 54-57
Miura, H. 1991: Evaluation of fetal renal arterial blood flow waveforms with pulsed Doppler flowmetry and the correlation to estimated fetal body weight, fetal urine production rate and amniotic fluid volume Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 43(12): 1647-1652
Capaccioli, L.; Gheri, G.; Carpi, R. 1993: The anteroposterior diameter of the head and the body of the pancreas in healthy Italian children Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology 98(3): 165-174
Persson, P.H.; Grennert, L.; Gennser, G.; Gullberg, B. 1978: Normal range curves for the intrauterine growth of the biparietal diameter Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement 78: 15-20
Habib, F.A. 2002: Prediction of low birth weight infants from ultrasound measurement of placental diameter and placental thickness Annals of Saudi Medicine 22(5-6): 312-314
Erkkola, R.; Ala-Mello, S.; Piiroinen, O.; Kero, P.; Sillanpää, M. 1985: Growth discordancy in twin pregnancies: a risk factor not detected by measurements of biparietal diameter Obstetrics and Gynecology 66(2): 203-206
Farrant, P.; Meire, H.B. 1985: A combined biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference graph: using a system velocity of 1540 metres per second Radiography 51(598): 220-221