Justification of prophylactic cesarean section and of labor induction depending on endocrine fetal maturity
Odent, M.
La Nouvelle Presse Medicale 6(29): 2610
1977
ISSN/ISBN: 0301-1518 PMID: 909751 Document Number: 116898
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Place, K.; Kruit, H.; Tekay, A.; Heinonen, S.; Rahkonen, L. 2019: Success of trial of labor in women with a history of previous cesarean section for failed labor induction or labor dystocia: a retrospective cohort study Bmc Pregnancy and Childbirth 19(1): 176Lee, B.O.; Major, F.J.; Weingold, A.B. 1971: Ultrasonic determination of fetal maturity at repeat cesarean section Obstetrics and Gynecology 38(2): 294-297
Temerinac, D.; Chen, X.I.; Sütterlin, M.; Kehl, S. 2015: Influence of Fetal Birth Weight on Caesarean Section Rate and Fetal Outcome After Induction of Labor In Vivo 29(5): 519-524
Witort, M. 1973: Degree of maternal and fetal blood oxygenation during cesarean section and the general condition of the newborn depending on the type of anesthesia Pediatria Polska 48(8): 989-996
Schneider, A.; Eiermann, W.; Pfeiffer, U.; Hepp, H. 1988: Prognostic factors in the indication for labor induction after previous delivery by cesarean section Zentralblatt für Gynakologie 110(17): 1086-1091
Sobande, A.A.; Albar, H. 2002: Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets in parous and grandmultiparous patients with previous cesarean section International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 78(1): 19-23
Smilov, I.; Mitev, L. 1984: Effect of the intervals of labor induction and uterine-incision delivery on the status of newborn infants in cesarean section Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 23(5): 404-412
Todumrong, N.; Somprasit, C.; Tanprasertkul, C.; Bhamarapravatana, K.; Suwannarurk, K. 2016: A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 99 Suppl. 4: S37-S41
Najmi, R.S. 1997: Justification of caesarean section for fetal distress Jpma. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 47(10): 250-252
Graff, G.; Kessler, I.; Levin, I.; Appelman, Z.; Lancet, M. 1985: Prophylactic mezlocillin therapy in cesarean section Harefuah 109(1-2): 6-8
Liabsuetrakul, T.; Lumbiganon, P.; Chongsuvivatwong, V. 2002: Prophylactic antibiotic prescription for cesarean section International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care 14(6): 503-508
Li, C.; Zeng, W.; Chen, Y. 2002: Analysis of prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi 37(1): 25-26
Swartz, W.H.; Grolle, K. 1981: The use of prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean section. A review of the literature Journal of Reproductive Medicine 26(12): 595-609
Katsulov, A.; Lazarov, L.; Sarkisian, A. 1989: Labor after having had a cesarean section Akusherstvo i Ginekologiia 28(4): 1-5
Qvist, N.; Storm, K. 1983: Cimethidine pre-anesthetic. A prophylactic method against Mendelson's syndrome in cesarean section Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 62(2): 157-159
French, L. 1996: Trial of labor after cesarean section Journal of Family Practice 43(6): 538-539
Freeman, G.M. 1982: The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in high-risk patients undergoing cesarean section Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 81(9): 610-615
Ranade, V.R.; Kale, A.G.; Purandare, V.N. 1972: Analysis of labor following previous cesarean section Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 18(2): 79-85
Khan, K.S.; Rizvi, A. 1995: The partograph in the management of labor following cesarean section International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 50(2): 151-157
Saad, A.H. 1997: Trial of labor compared with an elective second cesarean section New England Journal of Medicine 336(9): 658-659; Author Reply 659