Does pin tract infection after external fixator limits its advantage as a cost-effective solution for open fractures in low-middle income countries, a prospective cohort study
Shah, F.A.; Ali, M.A.; Kumar, V.; Alam, W.; Hasan, O.
JPMA. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 69(Suppl 1)(1): S41-S45
2019
ISSN/ISBN: 0030-9982 PMID: 30697018 Document Number: 699591
To determine the frequency of pin tract infection in external fixator tibia and its effects on the definite fracture fixation and bone healing. The prospective study was conducted at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan, from August 2017 to July 2018, and comprised patients regardless of age and gender with open fracture tibia Gustillo-Anderson type II and type IIIA. Pin tract infection was assessed following the application of locally made external fixation of tibia open fractures. Follow-up was done fortnightly till soft tissue healing, removal of external fixator and definite fracture healing. Pin tract infection was classifiedand treated according to the Checketts-Otterburn classification system. SPSS 20 was used for data analysis. Of the 117 patients, 95(81%) were males and 22(19%) were females with an overall mean age of 24.7±9.35 years. Pin tract infection was documented in 28(23.9%) patients. Minor and major pin tract infections were reported in 27(96.4%) and 1(3.5%) patient respectively. Soft tissues healed in 27(96.4%) cases. External fixator for initial stabilisation of open tibial fractures in all patients is recommended..