The Present State of Inter-Laboratory Differences in Setting and Practicing Critical Values -Results of a Questionnaire Survey Performed to the Laboratories of Keio University-Associated Hospitals
Ito, M.; Kano, S.; Nakagawa, T.; Kikuchi, H.; Shibata, A.; Ota, A.; Hayakawa, T.; Ogawa, H.; Tani, A.; Takeda, H.; Koyama, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Yamalzaki, K.; Murata, M.
Rinsho Byori. Japanese Journal of Clinical Pathology 65(1): 32-36
2017
ISSN/ISBN: 0047-1860 PMID: 30695509 Document Number: 694374
Presently we, Keio Endocrine and Metabolite Survey (KEMS) study group conducted a questionnaire sur- vey with respect to panic values in the laboratories belonging to Keio University-associated hospitals. As to the initial setting, most of the laboratories answered to play a leading role in preparing the necessary matters to implementation of panic values and revise them corresponding to physician's request on each occasion. In almost all laboratories, they did not verify whether the notification procedure does work to exert appropriate clinical action. The numbers of critical values answered by the 18 laboratories distributed widely in the test items (8-39) and their critical limits (10-68). As to the critical limits, the lower limits of serum K and blood glucose converged among the laboratories, however, the limits of other test items diverged. The results of the present survey regarding to critical values, although being in small scale, may submit the im- portant issue to be solved in near future. [Short Communication].