Clinton's Medicare buy-in concept revives debate on public option
Meyer, H.
Modern Healthcare 46(20): 10-11
2016
ISSN/ISBN: 0160-7480 PMID: 27491200 Document Number: 690594
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
DoBias, M. 2009: A break, then debate. Abortion, public option still divide reform efforts Modern Healthcare 39(48): 8-9Gardner, J. 1995: HCFA nursing home report revives debate on new rules Modern Healthcare 25(37): 8
DoBias, M. 2009: Still an option. Senate leaders mull public option, may lose support Modern Healthcare 39(43): 8-9
Block, H.; Gauducheau, I.; Castagna, B.; Gallais, S.; Roy, J.P.; Enriquez, E.; Donnetkamel, D. 2002: Les élèves face au débat : Les voix de la démocratie - Students and debate : Public debate: voices of democracy Pour (176): 61-88
Burns, J. 1993: Clinton likely to blitz the public electronically Modern Healthcare 23(22): 14-15
Wallace, C. 1984: HMOs await new Medicare option Modern Healthcare 14(1): 62; 64
Griffin, G.C. 1993: 'Clinton and Clinton' tort reform. An imaginary conversation between Bill and Hillary Postgraduate Medicine 94(1): 21-24
Pirozynski, T.; Pirozynski, M.; Postelnicu, C. 1982: The concept of mental health in the option of psychiatric attendance Revista Medico-Chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici Si Naturalisti Din Iasi 86(1): 21-26
Patriquin, L. 2001: The historical uniqueness of the Clinton welfare reforms : A new level of social misery? - L'unicité historique des réformes de la protection sociale sous Clinton : Un nouveau degré de misère sociale? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 28(3): 71-94
Foster, R.S.; Clemens, M.K. 2005: Medicare financial status, budget impact, and sustainability--which concept is which? Health Care Financing Review 27(2): 127-140
Poulindubois, D. 2006: Le développement du concept de « genre » : au-delà du débat inné/acquis - Gender development : beyond the nature vs. nurture debate Enfance (3): 213-215
Breckenridge, A. 2003: Debate that "this house believes the essential drug concept hinders the effective deployment of drugs in developing countries". Introduction Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 97(1): 1
Renckens, C.N.; van Dam, F.S.; van der Smagt, C.P. 2001: Definition of 'quack' in the public debate on alternative medicine Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 145(3): 141-142
Radcliffe, M. 2009: The debate around public service cuts lacks logic Nursing Times 105(38): 32
Appleby, B. 1997: The common good. the Canadian bishops and the public debate on contraception Conscience 18(3): 15-19
Safran, D.Gelb.; Wilson, I.B.; Rogers, W.H.; Montgomery, J.E.; Chang, H. 2002: Primary care quality in the Medicare Program: comparing the performance of Medicare health maintenance organizations and traditional fee-for-service medicare Archives of Internal Medicine 162(7): 757-765
Guimarães, R.M.ça.; Asmus, C.I.R.F.óe.; Meyer, A. 2007: DDT reintroduction for malaria control: the cost-benefit debate for public health Cadernos de Saude Publica 23(12): 2835-2844
Sparkes, P. 1974: Medicare ensures care for the 'public', what about the individual? Canadian Medical Association Journal 111(8): 850
Ganguly-Scrase, R. 2002: Renegotiating Boundaries: Self Perception and Public Debate on Globalization and Gender Equality in India Asian Journal of Women's Studies 8(4): 58-100
Fong, T. 2003: Public dismay for private plan. Seniors want federally run Medicare, survey says Modern Healthcare 33(25): 9