EU-US investor dispute rules could prevent reversal of decision to outsource NHS services, critics warn
Watson, R.
Bmj 350: H373
2015
ISSN/ISBN: 0959-8138 PMID: 25646819 Document Number: 685102
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Mantone, J. 2003: Shrinking technology. Nanotechnology holds the promise of spectacular medical advances, including a cure for cancer, but critics warn of dire consequences Modern Healthcare 33(49): 32Galloro, V. 2005: Standing dispute. CON reversal sought for open hospital Modern Healthcare 35(17): 26
Jaklevic, M.C. 1995: Incinerator emissions rules cause dispute over methodology and risk Modern Healthcare 25(7): 18
Monvall, E. 1977: 1--O for the profession in first central MBL (Law for Cooperative Decision Making) dispute Vardfacket 1(9): 18-26
Sharma, D.C. 2004: India pressed to relax rules on clinical trials. Drug companies claim changes are essential, but critics fear Indian patients will become guinea pigs Lancet 363(9420): 1528-1529
Hellenius, E.; Thärnström, A.; Wendt, R. 1983: Criticisms by critics engenders criticism by critics Vardfacket 7(22): 16-17
Pharow, P.; Lhotska, L.; Cheshire, P. 2013: Personal portable devices as enablers for advanced pHealth decision support and decision making services Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 189: 27-32
Valev, V.; Radeva, P. 1997: ECG recognition by Boolean decision rules Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 43 Pt B: 556-560
Lattavo, A.P. 2006: Exclusion criteria important in use of clinical decision rules American Family Physician 74(6): 921
Razavi, A.R.; Nyström, M.; Stachowicz, M.S.; Gill, H.; Ahlfeldt, H.; Shahsavar, N. 2006: An approach for generating fuzzy rules from decision trees Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 124: 581-586
Simson, E. 2004: Decision rules for hematology review. An international perspective Laboratory Hematology: Official Publication of the International Society for Laboratory Hematology 10(3): 157-158
Pijl, D.J. 2002: Breeders prepare themselves for stricter rules in dog and cat decision 1999 Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde 127(4): 126
Tandeter, H.B.; Shvartzman, P. 1997: Acute ankle injuries: clinical decision rules for radiographse American Family Physician 55(8): 2721-2728
Despotou, G.; Korkontzelos, I.; Matragkas, N.; Bilici, E.; Arvanitis, T.N. 2018: Structuring Clinical Decision Support Rules for Drug Safety Using Natural Language Processing Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 251: 89-92
Korenevskiĭ, N.A.; Khodeev, D.V.; Iatsun, S.M. 2008: Prediction of genesis and development of skin diseases at bioactive sites using fuzzy decision rules Meditsinskaia Tekhnika 2: 11-15
Schmidt, C.J.; Taylor, V.L.; Abbate, G.M.; Nieduzak, T.R. 1991: 5-HT2 antagonists stereoselectively prevent the neurotoxicity of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine by blocking the acute stimulation of dopamine synthesis: reversal by L-dopa Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 256(1): 230-235
Gubhaju, B.; De Jong, G.F. 2009: Individual versus Household Migration Decision Rules: Gender and Marital Status Differences in Intentions to Migrate in South Africa International Migration 47(1): 31-61
Gubhaju, B.; De Jong, G.F. 2009: Individual versus Household Migration Decision Rules: Gender and Marital Status Differences in Intentions to Migrate in South Africa International Migration 47(1): 31-61
Gausman, J.; Saggurti, N.; Adanu, R.; Bandoh, D.A.B.; Berrueta, M.; Chakraborty, S.; Kenu, E.; Khan, N.; Langer, A.; Nigri, C.; Odikro, M.A.; Pingray, V.; Ramesh, S.; Vázquez, P.; Williams, C.R.; Jolivet, R.R. 2023: Validation of a measure to assess decision-making autonomy in family planning services in three low- and middle-income countries: the Family Planning Autonomous Decision-Making scale (FP-ADM) PLOS one 18(11): E0293586
Gausman, J.; Saggurti, N.; Adanu, R.; Bandoh, D.A.B.; Berrueta, M.; Chakraborty, S.; Kenu, E.; Khan, N.; Langer, A.; Nigri, C.; Odikro, M.A.; Pingray, V.; Ramesh, S.; Vázquez, P.; Williams, C.R.; Jolivet, R.R. 2023: Validation of a measure to assess decision-making autonomy in family planning services in three low- and middle-income countries: the Family Planning Autonomous Decision-Making scale (FP-ADM) PLOS one 18(11): E0293586