Reducing urinary catheter use in patients hospitalized in internal medicine departments
Shimoni, Z.
Harefuah 153(7): 411
2014
ISSN/ISBN: 0017-7768 PMID: 25189033 Document Number: 676844
Clinical utility exists in certain situations for introducing a urinary catheter, but its use is the major cause of in-hospitaL acquired urinary tract infections. Furthermore, there are other complications of urinary catheterization, including urethral injury, macroscopic hematuria, and the inability to remove the catheter once introduced. Also, the in-hospital use of an indwelling urinary catheter in the elderly patient is associated with prolonged hospitalizations and an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Although there are clinical criteria for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter, there is considerable variability in the utilization rates between hospitals and departments. For example, the rates of catheterization in general internal medicine departments usually varies between 8% to 20% and increases with the age of the patients. However, it has been shown that up to 50% of catheterizations are unjustified. Therefore, there are efforts to decrease the rate of use of urinary catheters on the one hand, and to limit the number of days with the indwelling catheter in place on the other hand. These efforts have been partially successful. The root of the problem is that the criteria for catheterization are generally vague, leading to variable interpretations. More precise definitions along with continuous monitoring will likely decrease catheterization rates without putting the patient at risk.