What happened to the structured interviews after coercive measures?
Bauer, J.
Ugeskrift for Laeger 175(17): 1173
2013
ISSN/ISBN: 0041-5782 PMID: 23651779 Document Number: 664345
Document emailed within 1 workday
Related Documents
Nissen, G.; Andersen, J.; Lauritsen, B.J. 1986: Registration of coercive measures. A prospective study of the use of coercive measures in a district emergency psychiatry department Ugeskrift for Laeger 148(13): 789-792Nissen, G.; Andersen, J.; Lauritsen, B.J. 1986: Registration of coercive measures. A prospective study of the use of coercive measures in a district emergency psychiatry department Ugeskrift for Laeger 148(13): 789-792
Reisby, N. 1983: Registration of coercive measures Ugeskrift for Laeger 145(23): 1801-1805
Miller, P.R. 2001: Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 2. Interrater reliability and outcomes of structured vs. unstructured interviews Psychiatry Research 105(3): 265-271
Hall, R.C.; LeCann, A.F.; Schoolar, J.C. 1978: Amobarbital treatment of multiple personality. Use of structured video tape interviews as a basis for intensive psychotherapy Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 166(9): 666-670
Crossman, K.A.; Hardesty, J.L. 2018: Placing coercive control at the center: what are the processes of coercive control and what makes control coercive? Psychology of Violence 8(2): 196-206
Böcker, F.M. 1987: Standardized methods of assessment in psychiatry. Possibilities for using documentation systems, structured interviews and self-assessment scales Fortschritte der Medizin 105(33): 655-659
Wijsman-Grootendorst, A.; van Dam, R.M. 2005: The attitude of Dutch women of Turkish ancestry towards measures for the prevention and treatment of vitamin D deficiency; the results of focus group interviews Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde 149(17): 932-936
Aldag, L.; Tinsley, A. 1994: A comparison of focus group interviews to in-depth interviews in determining food choice influences Journal of Agricultural and Food Information 2(3): 89-96
Aldag, L.; Tinsley, A. 1994: A comparison of focus group interviews to in-depth interviews in determining food choice influences Journal of Agricultural and Food Information 2(3): 89-96
van Wijck, E.E.; Bosch, J.L.; Hunink, M.G. 1998: Time-tradeoff values and standard-gamble utilities assessed during telephone interviews versus face-to-face interviews Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 18(4): 400-405
Kramer, J.; Schlosser, S.; Kapp, E.; Hesselbrock, V.; Bucholz, K.; Swaim, K. 2000: A comparison of diagnostic interviews conducted by telephone with interviews conducted in person Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 24(5 Suppl): 75A
Hollingworth, L.S.; Hollingworth, L.S. 2000: Leta S. Hollingworth on coercive pronatalism Population and Development Review 26(2): 353-363
Pan, S.W.; Ruan, Y.; Spittal, P.M.; Pearce, M.E.; Qian, H-Zhu.; Li, D.; Zhang, Z.; Shao, Y. 2014: HIV vulnerabilities and coercive sex at same-sex sexual debut among men who have sex with men in Beijing, China Aids Care 26(6): 742-749
Weber, M. 2009: The problem of contraception legal guardianship: no coercive depot injection Pflege Zeitschrift 62(5): 293-295
Jayasree, A.K. 2004: Searching for justice for body and self in a coercive environment: sex work in Kerala, India Reproductive Health Matters 12(23): 58-67
Lombardo, P.A. 1996: Medicine, eugenics, and the Supreme Court: from coercive sterilization to reproductive freedom Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 13(1): 1-25
Lodico, M.A.; Gruber, E.; Diclemente, R.J. 1996: Childhoood sexual abuse and coercive sex among school-based adolescents in a Midwestern state Journal of Adolescent Health 18(3): 211-217
Irwin, C.E.; Rickert, V.I. 2005: Coercive sexual experiences during adolescence and young adulthood: a public health problem Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine 36(5): 359-361
Robinson, R.S. 2014: Population Policy in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Case of Both Normative and Coercive Ties to the World Polity Population Research and Policy Review 34(2): 201-221