Current status of implant-abutment--part 1: abutments for cemented versus screw retained restorations
Harel, N.; Livne, S.; Piek, D.; Marku-Cohen, S.; Ormianer, Z.
Refu'at Ha-Peh Veha-Shinayim 29(1): 19-25 63
2012
ISSN/ISBN: 0792-9935 PMID: 22991873 Document Number: 663488
Fixed implant supported single crowns and fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) have become an accepted treatment option for replacing and restoring missing teeth. Recent systematic reviews summarized excellent 5- and 10-year survival rates for both reconstruction types. In screw-retained restorations, the fastening screw provides a solid joint between the restoration and the implant abutment or between the restoration and the implant itself. With cement-retained prostheses, this restorative screw is eliminated for many reasons: esthetics, occlusal stability, and fabrication of passively fitting restorations. The purpose of this article is to review the variety of implant-abutments available for fabrication of fixed implant-supported restoration and compare between the various abutment forms (screw vs. cement retained).